cpujockey

cpujockey t1_iu4pc8x wrote

> Send them back to the stone age and keep them there.

no, this is not the fault of the russian people, but the actions of a piss baby in power. the russian people should not be held to account for the sins of their leader.

>Unfortunately I don't see my copious amounts of tax dollars going anywhere more useful soon.

Yes, but that doesn't just make it ok to dump tons of fucking cash when our own people are hurting. The US military has an operational budget that is already rubber stamped and allocated - make it their problem.

0

cpujockey t1_iu4n8xc wrote

> we're not spending nearly enough.

look, we can't be the only one making REAL contributions to the war effort. We could have ended this shit a long time ago, instead we've been acting like cucks and watching ukraine get fucked from the sidelines.

I am sorry, but sending enough money to a country that could make a meaningful impact on the housing crisis just doesn't resonate with me.

What resonates me is the USA waving our mighty erect cock at putin and giving him the deepest dicking he's ever experienced.

−1

cpujockey t1_iu4kv2f wrote

folks are keeping up with the status quo.

a lot of folks are pissed at the amount of spending we've been doing with regards to what's going down in ukraine - and I am one of those people. However, I believe ukrainians need freedom and putin should eat a dick. Just shitty we did not just take real action against putin and spend that money on solving shit like the homeless crisis here.

also,

fuck putin. he's a piece of shit fossil from the past that should have coagulated into something my chevy burns.

7

cpujockey t1_itmky79 wrote

ok good man, I'd hate to see you folks struggle. Shit is real rugged right here. I just barely got into a new role myself that is finally paying the bills - even then it feels like I'm coming up short with this new rental me and the mrs picked up for 2400 a month. really kicking myself for signing the lease - but happy it's happening.

by chance if you folks are interested in a trailer in Vergennes, I could cut you a good deal.

1

cpujockey t1_itb6qhl wrote

I'm kinda curious about this.

Seems fucked he'd like to his town about how the water is treated. On the other hand, I know that flouride in water can fuck with things like:

Making water based wood stain

Some fish don't like it

Then again I don't have much knowledge on these matters other than that. I'm not a denier of the positive effects of flouride, I know that in some scenarios it's not ideal. I think chlorine is likely more dangerous than flouride.

0

cpujockey t1_iszh7jt wrote

Sure, but voting for prop 2 or 5 only effects Vermont. As it should be.

What ever happens at the federal level is whatever, what's important is the here and now in Vermont.

I'm so proud of everyone taking action on this. Women's health and bodies need autonomy, and slavery sucks. So it's def a no-nonsense issue for voters.

−2