Recent comments in /f/washingtondc

MyGovThrowaway t1_je0n9r8 wrote

14th. 16th. New York. Connecticut. Much of 9th NW too.

Take New York, for example. 85% of the stopped traffic and bottleneck going west from NoMa into Mt Vernon Square is caused by the parking on the side of the road forcing drivers to squeeze from three lanes into two for a few blocks before opening up to four for the on-ramp to 395. So long as we’re dependent on cars, NY will continue to be a major thoroughfare, and parking on the side for those few blocks between N Capitol and New Jersey makes it hell and shuttles frustrated drivers off onto side streets.

4

MyGovThrowaway t1_je0m8xp wrote

The first clause you quote is dependent on the killing being purposeful. Intentionally killing someone during the commission of another felony elevates the charge to murder one. The second half deals with the conditions under which unintentional homicide can be elevated to murder one. FWIW, were it a crim law exam, I think you could score points by calling it a purposeful murder via depraved heart, but that’s at common law, and I don’t believe DC has the equivalent.

That said, given the history of violent crimes, the concurrent felonies, etc, and that he dragged the victim before pinning him against the tree, I’m disappointed, but not surprised, that the AUSA didn’t either go for a longer sentence on the manslaughter charge or even try for murder two.

0

Salami2000 t1_je0jwu6 wrote

Because I'm a glutton for punishment, and because you seem to have convinced 3 other illiterates that what you are saying makes sense, I'll try one more time.

The first part of that statute discusses traditional first degree murder. Only the part I quoted above is about felony murder. The big thing that should clue you in, is that second part starts with "or without any purpose to do so." Anything before that requires intent to kill. Felony murder is specifically about situations where someone did not intend to kill, so the part about intending to kill would not apply.

Only the specific named felonies in the second part can get you to felony murder. The other clue here, is that it would not make sense to say any felony applies, and then name specific felonies. Obviously these must be for separate things. Why do you think they're naming specific felonies?

I am using very small words, this should be easy.

0

AnIndecisiveFuck t1_je0iw7v wrote

Reply to comment by spectredirector in 🌸 by WeebedOut

That isn’t unique to cherry blossoms or this sub, my last city’s sub had a “famous cat” that everyone and their brother would post lol- just humans being humans 🤷🏼‍♀️

2

JustAcivilian24 t1_je0hnen wrote

While we’re name dropping, Morse Apartments is garbage at notifying residents about anything around the area or on the premises. I woke up at 5am once to my neighbors place getting raided by DCPD. That was fun. Also we had a string of cars get broken into and they didn’t say shit or do anything till a few days later.

Stay away from Morse please. They don’t deserve more money.

15

poirotoro t1_je0h8s7 wrote

Soupergirl's retail storefront has been essentially shuttered since the pandemic, (I think you could technically pick up orders at the door?), which felt like a waste of a Metro-adjacent location.

I'll be glad to get something that drives foot traffic at that corner again.

37