Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets

DYTTIGAF t1_jebr485 wrote

Reply to comment by old_shows in Commercial Office REITS Pop after Selloff [SLG] by old_shows

What's the problem Princess. Do you you really believe an inverted yield curve that predicted every recession for the last 50 years is going to be beneficial?

You only have 120 Karma. You have 9 posts about watches and 1 post on WSB. What are you some paid hack for this stock?

I can tell by your persistent disregard for reality and facts you're pumping this stock. You're such a lightweight you don't have enough brainpower for me to block you.

I will just let you be. Sucking your thumb.

0

VisualMod t1_jebqrpi wrote

Reply to What is your current analysis of corporate banking? by DetachedOptimist

>There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as the effects of recent events on different segments of the financial market will vary depending on a number of factors. However, in general, higher rates may make it more difficult for borrowers to obtain loans, and insolvencies among banks could lead to tighter lending standards and less available credit. As a result, companies may find it more difficult to finance M&A activity or expand their businesses through borrowing.

1

VisualMod t1_jebqqyq wrote

Reply to What is your current analysis of corporate banking? by DetachedOptimist

User Report
Total Submissions 1 First Seen In WSB 2 months ago
Total Comments 3 Previous Best DD
Account Age 2 months [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.)
1

DefendSection230 t1_jebom5s wrote

Reply to comment by NRA-4-EVER in Is Meta back? by NoneScan65

>If a bookstore banned some books claiming they were "dangerous" but then sold a book that could be ruled as inciting violence then they could be held liable.

No they can't.. Why would you think that? That would be punishing them for using their First Amendment right to no carry the books they don't want to carry.

​

>Smith v. California (1959)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._California
The court held that the free publication and distribution of books are protected under the constitution's guarantee of freedom of the press, and that a bookseller, such as Eleazar Smith, plays a key role in this publication and distribution. The court also cited that legal doctrines and devices are not capable of application under the constitution if they would have the effect of inhibiting freedom of expression by making citizens afraid or reluctant to exercise that freedom.

Section 230 protects Publishers, specifically.

>"Id. at 803 AOL falls squarely within this traditional definition of a publisher and, therefore, is clearly protected by §230's immunity."
>
>https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1075207.html#:~:text=Id.%20at%20803

1