Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets

VisualMod t1_je9b9o8 wrote

>I think you're right that NVDA is overvalued at the moment. I also think that the AI hype is largely responsible for this, as there are a lot of people who seem to believe that AI will be some sort of magic bullet that will solve all of our problems.

However, I don't think it's realistic to expect AI to replace mining entirely. Mining still has a lot of value, especially in terms of security and decentralization. Even if AI does eventually become more efficient than mining, it's not going to happen overnight, and so I don't think we should expect NVDA's stock price to crash just becausemining becomes less profitable.

1

VisualMod t1_je9b97j wrote

User Report
Total Submissions 1 First Seen In WSB 2 years ago
Total Comments 2631 Previous Best DD
Account Age 3 years [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.)
>TL;DR: NVDA is overvalued to fuck, this pump doesnt make sense, NVDA is make less in sales plus its currently under a high interest environment yet the stock has almost doubled. Im europoor so I cant afford long dated puts but i could i throw my last 600€ in my bank account into some juicy long dated puts. Now do what you want with this info.
1

_aposematism_ t1_je9alo6 wrote

They didn’t have £1.4B of assets, they had £1.4B of equity (which is even better, because it’s already assets minus liabilities) but the catch is that the number refers to before the bank run.

It’s difficult to know how much equity was left after the bank run. Definitely less than £1.4B, but definitely more than £1. HSBC was able to buy it for £1 because SVB’s reputation was damaged beyond repair, so eventually their equity would have gone to zero without a bailout, hence £1 was a kind of decent bid considering the likely value of equity in the future.

1

wallstreetbets-ModTeam t1_je9a3z7 wrote

Thanks for your submission!

r/WallStreetBets is known for making absurd but sometimes profitable trades that no one ever considered possible.

To keep making that possible, we need your help in keeping the feed of threads interesting and exciting.

We try to move all the short and basic questions, analysis, or jokes to the daily thread so that the best quality content can stick around and be more visible.

This is definitely a bit subjective, and there are no hard and fast rules, but a few indicators that your post should have really been a comment in the daily thread include:

  • Asking a question that is easily googleable or has likely been asked before. E.g. "What app should I use?", "What should I invest in?".

  • Beating a meme to death, like the 10 millionth, "inverse cramer" joke again.

  • Reposting jokes from the front page but slightly altered to be related to trading.


All that being said, we are here to help. We want to make it as easy as possible for you to post to our community. We have to balance this with making the subreddit interesting for our readers.

If you need some guidance, don't hesitate to reach out to modmail and we'll give you some pointers!

1

jr1tn t1_je99w83 wrote

Options are for sophisticated investors with detailed understanding of how complex securities such as options work. This is not meant as a criticism of OP but as a comment on options and who should be trading them. If you are trading them without understanding the risks involved then you are flying blind and should look elsewhere.

2