Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets

AwesomeParker t1_je7mqe6 wrote

I live in ID. I was mailed 2 papers.

1 was a paper stating that I was denied my unemployment request.

The 2nd was a paper stating that I was denied PUA with my unemployment request.

I have been self employed since 2017. I have NEVER filled unemployment from 2017 forward OR PUA. It shows my unemployment quarterly earnings was $9k each for 2019?🤷🏻‍♂️ but nothing after that.

Is Idaho Labour Department shadow filing for people to inflate unemployment or denile of unemployment benefits to alter statistics? I know of 2 others here locally, that are self employed, that have recieved the same papers. NEVER FILING. I don’t know what this would do for statistics. I’m only asking questions.

PUA = Pandemic Unemployment Assistance The $200/wk or $600/mo thing that people were given.

I never got it. It ended in 2021 June as far as i know.🤷🏻‍♂️

0

thus t1_je7l0jo wrote

A few other data points:

  • $FRC institutional ownership is still 97%+
  • The $FRC implied volatility and option premium has really dropped over the last week, indicating that nerves are calming. Trust me, I will miss this, as I was making bank selling cash-secured puts.
26

KenGriffinsDaddy t1_je7kha8 wrote

Pretty sure Moody’s just said unrealized losses represent almost 40% of the money FRC set aside to absorb losses and they would also take losses on a large amount of residential mortgage loans, which is why they downgraded them. That hasn’t changed. It’s alarming that they needed the 30 billion schneebs from their buddies to survive, no? There is more to this than they are leading on for sure but what we see and know is more than enough to stay away. The fucking thing was trading at $147/share less than 2 months ago. Big depositors and smart money left/sold and I have my doubts it was simply because “they unfairly lost confidence”

18

No_Grapefruit4066 t1_je7ka3u wrote

I think the main premise here is that smaller businesses with more focused management will attract investor attention and help reduce the conglomerate discount. These businesses can merge, acquire or divest their businesses with less scrutiny and will be more responsive to activist shareholders.

Given the focus on efficiency rather than growth at all costs, shareholders and regulators may like smaller companies that emerge

This is yet a theory

2

2conservative t1_je7ijvm wrote

Well, that may be but that wasn't really the point. I was just pointing out that in addition to Big Tech, people ran to Crypto and Gold. The last two actually make more sense to me since they would be the natural beneficiaries of a failing financial system putting the USD at risk (I'm not saying this is happening - only that a lot of folks are worried it might). The Big Tech injection I think was just a response to a volatile and declining market. Lastly, just like a piece of paper with numbers written on it, Crypto is only as valuable as people think it is. That can be said about almost anything. Art, NFTs, collectibles - anything that provides little function but is valuable for no other reason than because people think it is.

2