Recent comments in /f/technology
Educational-Ice-319 t1_jefw6dy wrote
Reply to comment by DrQuantum in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
Not necessarily. COPPA has no such requirement, for example. Instead, it applies if you know or reasonably suspect a child under a specific age could or is using the platform. It’s sort of a “don’t ask don’t tell” dilemma here.
flyswithdragons t1_jefvyiw wrote
Reply to Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
I understand why but this is unlikely to help Italy ..
DrQuantum t1_jefvw5g wrote
Reply to comment by Educational-Ice-319 in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
If storing data for children has different compliance laws then you have to collect that data to store any data at all and remain in compliance.
fleeting_revelation t1_jefvewm wrote
Reply to comment by gk99 in Ads are coming for the Bing AI chatbot, as they come for all Microsoft products by Stiltonrocks
Most ad blockers nowadays ad block obtrusive ads such as popups and not all ads.
Edit: talking about ad blockers built into the browser
XanKreigor t1_jefv3qo wrote
Reply to comment by PandasPD in Meta stops offering remote work in new job postings as Mark Zuckerberg pushes the benefits of coming to the office by Ben_aid
I guess you agree with my point about forcing employers to pay for work done.
A few grand per year for an employee sounds a bit like a raise. I support it.
Admin costs rise, other costs fall such as hours scheduled but not worked (e.g. calling out sick) fall. Yes, the company is just going to eat these costs. "What if it gets passed on?" That's the point. Wrap up the total cost of a product in the price. Stop externalizing costs that shouldn't be. The cost of paying workers a living wage is a pittance when lumped into the price of a service or product.
Make better algorithms? I'm not sure what you expect. If the company isn't finding suitable hires within their radius they will adapt, like increasing the radius or reducing the requirements.
There are already exemptions for small businesses for onerous costs such as healthcare, as well as models for scaling mileage in rural places with small pizza places. Again, it's making things harder than they need to be. Unsure why you're acting flippantly towards exemptions in your response.
Sounds like we went around the monopoly board and collected $200 rather than full circle, but hey, everyone has a different opinion. Thanks for sharing yours.
kitteybox123 t1_jefv3mp wrote
I specifically chose my trim model BECAUSE of apple CarPlay. If they didn’t have it I would have stuck with the base. And now that I been car shopping again, apple CarPlay is must. But also I don’t buy American garbage, and especially not a GM lol
freerangepops t1_jefv21l wrote
Reply to Here’s What Happened When ChatGPT Wrote to Elected Politicians - Cornell researchers used artificial intelligence to write advocacy emails to state legislators. The responses don’t bode well for democracy in the age of A.I. by speckz
This study assumed that politicians assess the content of letters they receive beyond what is necessary to appeal for money. That is bizarrely naive for a social researcher.
The_Last_Green_leaf t1_jefuog7 wrote
Reply to comment by SectorEducational460 in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
but the topic isn't relevant because we're talking about china's current ongoing genocide.
Gojogab t1_jefunv7 wrote
NYPD needs a complete overhaul.
Fredg450 t1_jefud1g wrote
Reply to comment by MotorballPlayer99 in China’s chip industry will be ‘reborn’ under U.S. sanctions, Huawei says, confirming breakthrough by maki23
So your telling me that the USA really care about the people of Taiwan.
No-Attempt-161 t1_jeftxou wrote
Reply to Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
Their choice. The real question is will openAI care in the end? I mean it their citizens want the tool the work around is probably quite easy as we see in China.
Ambitious-Position25 t1_jeftulu wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
Stay far away, please. Thanks!
Ambitious-Position25 t1_jeftp0o wrote
Reply to comment by quettil in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
They would have to drop all of EU.
JubalHarshaw23 t1_jeft529 wrote
Reply to Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Why is Warner even bothering? SCOTUS is well on it's way to bench legislating something far more destructive.
[deleted] t1_jefsvbm wrote
Reply to Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
[removed]
AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_jefs6mo wrote
Automobile touch screens are unsafe AF.
All I need is the ability to play media on my phone and cast it to the car's screen and audio system.
That's it.
Anything else to control the car needs some hardware knobs and buttons.
Car companies suck at making digital products and they need to knock it the fuck off.
JubalHarshaw23 t1_jefs2ac wrote
Police that don't take orders from their legal civilian bosses. Just waiting for the MAGA Messiah to regain power.
moses420bush t1_jefrh9m wrote
Reply to comment by GomaEspumaRegional in GPT-4 poses too many risks and releases should be halted, AI group tells FTC. by VAMSI_BEUNO
Are they actually intelligent?
Boo_Guy t1_jefqs0z wrote
So what's the penalty for not complying? Is there any? If so is anyone going to enforce it? Will they charge anybody?
I'm going to guess that there's no penalty and/or no enforcement so it's actually just a suggestion, not an actual law.
Lootcifer- t1_jefqrfz wrote
“Bro we enforce the law, not follow it” -Sergeant Pig
VdomanFla t1_jefqr3m wrote
Reply to comment by Mutex70 in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
I predict that the comment before yours will be down-voted. There, I'm off on my journey as a prognosticator.
Youvebeeneloned t1_jefqmbb wrote
Nothing new... NYPD is probably one of the WORST for following the law. They literally were running a illegal surveillance shop in NJ spying on Muslims after 9/11 which produced ZERO leads, and cost millions in both running the unit, and the settlements that followed when NJ state, NJ cities, Muslim groups, and others sued them.
VdomanFla t1_jefqfhk wrote
Reply to comment by Mutex70 in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
I work in the corporate meetings business. Ray was hired one time to give an afternoon keynote speech, and this was many, many years ago. One takeaway I remember was that he predicted that everybody would have their own IP address, maybe even a tattoo or transmitter under one of their fingers. That way anyone can walk up to any terminal and all their lives will be accessible. The justification would be freedom of travel, money access, and medical history, all their data and photos can be accessed without the need to carry anything.
It was a very utopian vision and didn't take into account all the unscrupulous activity that big companies and government would engage in.
atwegotsidetrekked t1_jefw86i wrote
Reply to comment by VelveteenAmbush in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Yes we had access to Soviet TV. I am GenX and grew up in the 80s. We even studied Soviet culture in Social Studies in High Schools. Because we are supposed to be the better system and not in fear of lesser authoritarian regimes.
But you obviously would rather live in China