Recent comments in /f/technology
neereeny t1_jeexchw wrote
Reply to comment by essaitchthrowaway3 in Virgin Orbit fails to secure funding, will cease operations and lay off nearly entire workforce by getBusyChild
Orbit was specifically for small satellite launch off a Boeing 747. Galactic is focused on space tourism. Pay $450k for a ride to space.
Yard-of-Bricks1911 t1_jeex192 wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
Until enough steps are taken to walk back the labor market into the hands of employers - they will continue to struggle finding talent to fill positions without remote work being an option.
Even then they're going to struggle, as everyone who wants to work or has to work for the most part has a job. Even with these layoffs. The reductions are almost all in the big tech sector which is but a portion of the total technology sector.
Feb labor numbers were pretty revealing there.
From an unemployment perspective the US over the last couple months has been where it was under Trump pre-COVID. And yes that's both the headline number and the often cited "real unemployment" number which is always higher than the headline number.
But yea this is all a real estate play. It's crazy too how hard it's being used to push the agenda. Must protect corp real estate! haha nope, no we don't.
Heres_your_sign t1_jeewv0g wrote
Reply to Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of data collection - Instead of a yes/no consent, Meta users will fill out a form and include justification. by speckz
So don't use their platforms. It's that easy.
Myderelictlife t1_jeewfmr wrote
Reply to comment by sephy009 in A top AI researcher reportedly left Google for OpenAI after sharing concerns the company was training Bard on ChatGPT data by jack_lafouine
I tried it again yesterday. I inherited a poorly written work document that had all the important information in it but was overall lackluster and didn’t have much fluency. I asked Bard if it could help me rewrite the document, sort of like I’d paste a document to grammarly; but it really only offered suggestions of ways to edit and never to edit the actual document.
It also includes direct links to the websites that it’s getting it’s answers from, so it feels like it’s reciting the top google search results.
despitegirls t1_jeewdii wrote
Reply to comment by gk99 in Twitter announces new API pricing, posing a challenge for small developers by rookie-mistake
You have to use an authenticator account, or pay for SMS authentication.
ms1711 t1_jeevwkt wrote
Reply to comment by Bannon9k in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Because it's definitely not written "badly" and vague on purpose! The government never oversteps its bounds!
Well-written laws are narrow and clear. Any room for "interpretation" is room for abuse.
Horat1us_UA t1_jeevpwy wrote
Reply to comment by happyscrappy in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
They “didn’t commit fraud” just because government do not consider their fraud as fraud. Look on Iceland
LoafyLemon t1_jeevlyj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
Tell me you've never set foot in Europe without telling me.
WangEnlargement t1_jeev8q2 wrote
Reply to comment by ddr1ver in The New Light Is Bad: There’s something off about LED bulbs — which will soon be, thanks to a federal ban, the only kind you can buy. by newzee1
> They mix LEDs in a bulb to get a certain spectrum of light.
No serious LED bulb manufacturer has done this for decades. The LEDs are coated with a phospher compound that converts a single wavelength to a spectrum. You can buy high CRI bulbs that are nearly indistinguishable from incandescent bulbs, but they are dimmer than standard 80 CRI bulbs.
LetMePushTheButton t1_jeev7an wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
I started the job I’m in now as a remote worker. I got highest marks on my performance review.
I’m more productive and less stressed. Of course middle managers are scared. Anything to justify their unnecessary role.
8ew8135 t1_jeeupvr wrote
Reply to A top AI researcher reportedly left Google for OpenAI after sharing concerns the company was training Bard on ChatGPT data by jack_lafouine
Google doesn’t develop things it buys things, they only needed a dummy model to scare other companies into thinking there is a competitor that could outmaneuver them if they don’t sell to Google, it’s not like Google is trying to beat anyone with their tech.
gheebutersnaps87 t1_jeeuf7f wrote
Reply to comment by Hbirdee in Virgin Orbit fails to secure funding, will cease operations and lay off nearly entire workforce by getBusyChild
They should head to the old REPCONN headquarters if they’re looking for work out in the Mojave
psyon t1_jeeu1gr wrote
Reply to comment by crawling-alreadygirl in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
Then why have anyone goto the office if they are going to be taught remotely?
realistic_linguistic t1_jeeu153 wrote
XanKreigor t1_jeetwk0 wrote
Reply to comment by PandasPD in Meta stops offering remote work in new job postings as Mark Zuckerberg pushes the benefits of coming to the office by Ben_aid
We do, though. There are quite a number of legal cases where individuals and governments at state and federal levels win on labor-related grounds. These are around not being compensated for work performed. Some of them include salaried employees.
We've already got a mileage stipend in place, even in the public sector. I'm unsure why you're under the impression that can't be extended. If it's an hourly employee, pay them from the start of the commute. If it's a salaried employee, consider their start time the same when it comes to calculating benefits. We don't need to make things unduly difficult. Someone abuses it in a "5 hour commute"? Fire them. We've got plenty of rules on the books for time fraud. This is the part where companies determine whether they want to hire someone. In addition, generally most companies don't hire people from an hour or more away.
It's not that there aren't flaws, it's that the flaws don't outweigh the benefits.
Educational-Ice-319 t1_jeetpgx wrote
Reply to comment by EmbarrassedHelp in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
I can’t ever see GDPR as being construed as to mandate more Personal Information collection in order to comply. That’s a crazy argument from Italian regulators. Shame it’s coupled with a legitimate, critical ruling.
WhatTheZuck420 t1_jeetdgb wrote
Reply to comment by Vicariouslysuffering in Court Orders GitHub to Reveal Who Leaked Twitter’s Source Code by John_Parlet
not plot twist. playbook.
crawling-alreadygirl t1_jeet2r7 wrote
Reply to comment by sooprvylyn in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
You can socialize and collaborate outside work, you know. It actually gets a lot easier when you're not wasting all your time going into a job.
brocka684 t1_jeesyww wrote
Reply to comment by ParadigmCG in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Or…You just get Real poor and Default on the loan. Fcuk it! You’re already gonna be living for Much longer. Might as well crash your credit score and high tail it into the Beach. Live off the land and Never be seen again!
Educational-Ice-319 t1_jeesypk wrote
Reply to comment by Tight-Ad447 in Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of data collection - Instead of a yes/no consent, Meta users will fill out a form and include justification. by speckz
As long as legal divisions treat the interests of the consumer in data privacy as adversarial to the interests of the firm, US companies will not get this. It’s a conscious choice to prioritize a few extra immediate dollars over the intangibles of company reputation, long-term stability and differentiation, and overall compliance.
WhatTheZuck420 t1_jeesxj8 wrote
Reply to comment by kungfu_panda_express in $335,000 pay offered for ‘AI whisperer’ jobs in red-hot market by ChirperChiara
someone mention elizabeth holmes?
[deleted] t1_jeeswwo wrote
Reply to comment by demilitarizdsm in Italian regulators order ChatGPT ban over alleged violation of data privacy laws by Captain_Calamari_
[deleted]
crawling-alreadygirl t1_jeeswvw wrote
Reply to comment by psyon in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
They can still communicate. I've trained and mentored remote employees quite effectively.
Educational-Ice-319 t1_jeesq6p wrote
Reply to Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of data collection - Instead of a yes/no consent, Meta users will fill out a form and include justification. by speckz
Yeah nah, that won’t fly. It doesn’t even fly here in the US, an opt-out requirement is an opt-out, justification has no place here
Cycleguy57 t1_jeexf8z wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
I’d love for this to be an accurate prediction. It’s not.