Recent comments in /f/technology

Riaayo t1_je4b648 wrote

For gas, coal, or fossil fuels you have to pay to extract, refine, and transport the fuels - then also have to build and run the infrastructure to burn it for energy.

Solar and wind you generate and "extract" in one go. The solar panels/plant is collecting and generating power at once. The wind turbine is collecting and generating power at once. There's no shipping or pipelining sunlight and wind.

The "cost" of mining/extraction is basically non-existent. You've gotta buy fuel to burn it. You don't have to buy sunlight or wind to generate power of fit.

That on top of it being cheaper and easier to roll out solar panels and wind farms than it is these other power plants, and the lower cost is clear.

2

RayTheGrey t1_je4aoua wrote

A single person could conceivably outproduce thousands of artists drawing/photoshoping images. And to verify whether something is true or not, you need people.

I'm not sure if anything can be done about it, but the sheer volume of content enabled by generative models is a little concerning.

1

Glittering_Power6257 t1_je49f6f wrote

As Nvidia had fairly recently learned, blockades from running certain algorithms will be circumvented. Many applications also use GPGPU for acceleration of non-graphics applications (GPUs are pretty much highly parallel supercomputers on a chip), so cutting off GPGPU is not on the table either. Unless you wish to just completely screw over the open source community, and go the white list route.

4

GekkosGhost t1_je47xeg wrote

>I would push for fossil fuel bans until the day I die.

You'll have too. Cars last 20 years and even when new sales cease the existing fleet will require fuelling. Classic cars, many of which are over 40 years old now, will continue requiring fuel for another 40+ years.

I don't mind electric cars. They can be fun. But we're decades, plural, away from having enough infrastructure to support mass adoption here in the UK. It's very imminent they don't push back the switchover closer to the time.

1

Fastriverglide t1_je46w6t wrote

That COULD be part of the interfaith dialogue. I mean who KNOWS WHAT WILL work in the end.

I'd much prefer to have them united under such circumstances rather than in the mouthfrothing hatred of atheists 🤔

4

SwagginsYolo420 t1_je46oaa wrote

The hardware is already out there though.

Also it would be a terrible idea to have an entire new emerging technology only in the hands of the wealthy. That's just asking for trouble.

It would be like saying regular hardware shouldn't be allowed to run photoshop or a spreadsheet or word processor because somebody might do something bad with it.

People are going to have to learn than images and audio and video can be faked, just like they have to learn that an email from a Nigerian price is also a fake.

There's no wishing this stuff away, the cat is already out of the bag.

10