Can we get a businessinsider filter? their articles are awful.

Words of spiteful relatives when they found you won the lottery.

"Your" data didn't built ChatGPT. It's trained on publicly available data that can be found on the Internet. Case point, if you give ChatGPT your name, it can't use that to tell you info about yourself.

Don't be like Disney and stake claims on public domain data.

[removed]

[deleted]

It is most probably true for up to the 5 updates...

Certainly feels like they are making things slower... my RTX 3080ti does not feel like much of an upgrade these days...

Have you looked at /r/artificial/ ?

Sounds like something you could do with Neon OS

You don’t say…

A red herring?

Oh I get that for sure. I’m not an expert but I get the impression that Boeing is way too caught up in its own Bureaucracy. They’re still developing products like they did in the 1960’s; lack of innovation and spend, spend, spend. That model is dead and buried.

I have not heard about any problems with them. If you have sources, please do share.

The problem with thesis' like this is that it assumes proponents of proposals like this want an open web as it exists today. Many are quite open about the fact that they don't for various reasons.

apple?

Yyuuuppp. Came here to say this. I've been a web dev since before mobile responsive was a thing. I miss the "User comes first" outlook. Now, job applications scream for devs who understand good user experience. Then, when you start working on a project, there's some user experience concerns, but it all gets thrown out the window for the sake of ads, pop-ups, whatever. I've had so many heated discussions in meetings about the trashing of UX.

[removed]

[removed]

If they wanted to kill IA they should start with all the copyrighted music on there. It's a fine line between archiving and file sharing.

[deleted]

crap article with some facts mentioned

> vpns can be deemed illegal

Can't wait to become a criminal

> is 'taxes' with the right of nation States, including democratically elected ones, to regulate tech as they see fit.

They should "regulate tech as they see fit"?

Even when it might potentially violate international trade agreements like CUSMA, international treaties like the Berne Convention, and go against their own supreme court's decision on how limiting linking in any way would be against people's freedom of expression?

This is not about "regulating tech", this is taking a sledgehammer to one of the major pillars of the internet in order to enrich media corporations.

No one in their right mind, should be falling for a short-sighted, computer illiterate government's attempt to take advantage of the hate against google & facebook in order to mandate payments for linking and deliver boatloads of cash to their allies in the broadcasting sector (which stands to get 75% of the money, even if they don't produce any news at all).

A whole lot of under-40 politicians are just as ignorant and that's because they are politicians. It has nothing to do with age so disabuse yourself of that because it makes you look ill-informed.

But is it still going to lag when you share your screen to your coworkers?

or just randomly not be able to connect you for no apparent reason