Recent comments in /f/technology

[deleted] t1_jdxt5n2 wrote

The issue here was that libraries aren't able to own these books though because publishers refuse to sell them the digital copies.

Personally, I think IP law as written was on the publishers' side here (for better or worse), but the issue is that libraries are being left in a fundamentally different position in terms of e-books than they were with physical copies.

4

[deleted] t1_jdxsjjy wrote

Pretty much the outcome I expected. It's hard to argue copyright law as written wasn't firmly on the side of the publishers, especially once internet archive moved away from distributing the works digitally on a strict 1:1 basis with a physical copy.

(and before anyone says it, I'm not taking the publishers' side here, but the law is the law.)

4

The_Strawberry_Dove t1_jdxrxml wrote

Hello!

About a month ago I got a Seagate hard drive. I have been able to remove it and attach it successfully up until today. But when I try to open a game it says that it isn't downloaded, and when I go to change the download location to the hard drive, it says either "D:/ is unavailable right now" or "The request had failed due to a fatal hard drive issue."

Anyways, If someone could help me it would be greatly appreciated! :)

1

ProShortKingAction t1_jdxqskd wrote

Belt and Road initiative loans are relatively low compared to other sources you would go to for a project like this like the IMF who would be saddling you with a higher interest rate and a bunch of stipulations involving how you can run your economy. The debt trap isn't anything on the surface it's that China is giving these loans to historically unstable countries that no other source would be willing to lend to because there is no guarantee they will be economically stable. So you take the loan because of course you will be the one to turn your country around and keep the boat from tipping over and then a nearby harvest fails, bread prices go up, and everything goes to shit. Now here you are stuck with this loan and no capacity to repay it

7

talley89 t1_jdxn2zh wrote

From the brilliantly written article which I challenge anyone to dispute

Google users have developed one very specific complaint about the ubiquitous search engine: They can't find any answers. A simple search for "best pc for gaming" leads to a page dominated by sponsored links rather than helpful advice on which computer to buy. Meanwhile, the actual results are chock-full of low-quality, search-engine-optimized affiliate content designed to generate money for the publisher rather than provide high-quality answers. As a result, users have resorted to work-arounds and hacks to try and find useful information among the ads and low-quality chum. In short, Google's flagship service now sucks.

And Google isn't the only tech giant with a slowly deteriorating core product. Facebook, a website ostensibly for finding and connecting with your friends, constantly floods users' feeds with sponsored (or "recommended") content, and seems to bury the things people want to see under what Facebook decides is relevant. And as journalist John Herrman wrote earlier this year, the "junkification of Amazon" has made it nearly impossible for users to find a high-quality product they want — instead diverting people to ad-riddled result pages filled with low-quality products from sellers who know how to game the system.

27