Recent comments in /f/technology
Adorable-Ad-3223 t1_jdxhxq6 wrote
Reply to Publishers beat Internet Archive as judge rules e-book lending violates copyright by thawingSumTendies
I feel the brush of a sea breeze in my cheeks.
[deleted] t1_jdxhga5 wrote
Reply to comment by LogRepulsive5113 in China Energy proposes $1bn floating solar farm In Zimbabwe by Wagamaga
[deleted]
XalAtoh t1_jdxh0io wrote
Reply to comment by chucklingmoose in Microsoft says its new version of Teams is twice as fast by Puginator
"Modern" Skype is also Electron/web crap.
[deleted] t1_jdxgwmh wrote
Reply to comment by KazakiLion in Microsoft says its new version of Teams is twice as fast by Puginator
[removed]
Comfortable_Excuse41 t1_jdxg8qu wrote
Reply to comment by BrownMan65 in China Energy proposes $1bn floating solar farm In Zimbabwe by Wagamaga
That’s why the IMF had guideline. Sri Lanka couldn’t meet those guidelines so they went to china. It wasn’t the interest rate. China knew what was going on. They had the ability to make china merchant port 65 percent ownership. They could of forced them to wait. It’s a debt trap plain and simple. Plus your whole argument was that china was using debt trap diplomacy.
3vi1 t1_jdxg87x wrote
Meanwhile they've "updated" the Linux users from a working electron app to a PWA that doesn't even do notifications. Completely unacceptable for production use.
Mods_suck_42069 t1_jdxfejh wrote
Reply to comment by B33f-Supreme in Big Tech is making its stuff slower and stupider — on purpose by treetyoselfcarol
Explains a lot about Reddit as well, and the collusion between the "Power mod jannies" and the admins. Hell, that could be approximately a dozen or so paragraphs just covering what Reddit was in 2010 versus how it is today.
MaximumNecessary t1_jdxfatr wrote
Still bloated and slow as heck. Twice as fast as an eternity to start up is still an eternity.
KickyMcAssington t1_jdxf3nb wrote
Reply to comment by SAGreer in Big Tech is making its stuff slower and stupider — on purpose by treetyoselfcarol
Bing chat which uses ChatGPT can do that for you properly, it will actually read the webpage instead of just the title. https://www.bing.com/new
[deleted] t1_jdxezau wrote
Reply to comment by LogRepulsive5113 in China Energy proposes $1bn floating solar farm In Zimbabwe by Wagamaga
[deleted]
maqbeq t1_jdxenj4 wrote
One day we'll even have something similar to the OS from the Her movie?
TheJadedSF t1_jdxe3or wrote
Teams was frankensteined to become something it wasn't originally intended for - it wasn't meant to be a competitor to Slack, or Zoom, or the new Skype for Business. So I take it that they're finally getting around to re-writing some of the fundamental structure to support what it has become. One can hope, anyway.
blobdylan t1_jdxdbs9 wrote
Reply to comment by ThreeToMidnight in The Internet Archive is defending its digital library in court today by OutlandishnessOk2452
Okay, but that doesn't really apply to my point. My issue was with your statement that, "On top of that they actually profit from ads on the site, so the publishers are also using those profits to strengthen their case."
There are no ads on the Internet Archive. That's it, my whole point, nothing else. If you still don't believe me, go to the Internet Archive and look around. I'm not looking to argue about it.
maqbeq t1_jdxcuq2 wrote
Reply to comment by jeffyoulose in Google Groups has been left to die by CrankyBear
Or attend Google meets instead of you, yay!
BrownMan65 t1_jdxctil wrote
Reply to comment by Comfortable_Excuse41 in China Energy proposes $1bn floating solar farm In Zimbabwe by Wagamaga
>That’s beside the the point
No that's literally not besides the point. That is the point. Sri Lanka mismanaged the whole project and couldn't pay their debts because they didn't follow the plans that were established for them. It is not China's, or any country's, duty to baby a nation if they decide they want to go their own path. If Sri Lanka decides they want to move on with phase 2 immediately after phase 1, then that is solely on Sri Lanka and no one else.
Lorddon1234 t1_jdxcltm wrote
Reply to comment by Khoza604 in China Energy proposes $1bn floating solar farm In Zimbabwe by Wagamaga
I bet you also believed Iraq has WMDs
maqbeq t1_jdxcdgr wrote
Man I hate Teams big time.
Was forced down our throats coming from Slack and it's like night and day
KhellianTrelnora t1_jdxccb0 wrote
Reply to Inaudible ultrasound attack can stealthily control your phone, smart speaker by redhatGizmo
And this is why you make sure that you have the assistants set to recognize who is speaking.
Or, use an iPhone. From personal experience, if you can get Siri to do something useful, you’ve earned whatever you can get.
beef-o-lipso t1_jdxbgws wrote
Reply to comment by heelspider in Publishers Get One Step Closer To Killing Libraries by vriska1
I didn't make it past the title.
spisHjerner t1_jdxbfbr wrote
A generous take on a series of bad decisions by CEOs at all these companies. Stop giving these people more credit by saying things like "on purpose" and "to appease investors." These corporations are out of touch and made huge amounts of risky investments that didn't pan out. They deserve to fail.
Comfortable_Excuse41 t1_jdxbaqd wrote
Reply to comment by BrownMan65 in China Energy proposes $1bn floating solar farm In Zimbabwe by Wagamaga
That’s beside the the point, China knew very well the couldn’t pay back the loan. The loan about the 2 percent was made with contingent that the China merchant point would get 65 percent in 2012. In 2016 when they relinquish 80 percent ownership for 99 year contract. They couldn’t pay it off.
zazz1337 t1_jdxb4ft wrote
Reply to comment by Samuraispirits in Online trolls are taking a toll in China by Crimbobimbobippitybo
What the fuck are you talking about lmao. Unreal.
mixinmono t1_jdxay52 wrote
I_AM_TRY t1_jdx9j89 wrote
Reply to Publishers beat Internet Archive as judge rules e-book lending violates copyright by thawingSumTendies
Sad to see data not be sufficient evidence. Publishers aren't losing anything, other than potential ambassadors and fans
nakedhitman t1_jdxjqh2 wrote
Reply to comment by PhilLB1239 in GrapheneOS: Why I ditched Google for a privacy-focused Pixel ROM by ProgsRS
It's not worth it to me. Privacy .com randomizes my payment info, hides my name and address from merchants, and doesn't sell my info to advertisers. It doesn't do NFC payments, but I never cared about that.