His stories about the Laws of Robotics were deliberately designed to show that the Laws wouldn't work, and showed the flaws and loopholes inherent in them

What are Issac Asimov's Laws of Robotics? Can we get AI to hold true to them?

Sneeches on the Beach by Dr. Seuss.

An AI is just an algorithm. It needs a tool to attack. With the US's (I think failed) logic of "guns don't kill people but people do" then who would be doing the attacking part?

But what if I scan a library book that I check out at a library? Seems to me, the only issue is the ease of making a copy, not the potential of retaining one.

seem like click bait.

Gates saw the chatlogs of someone that asked the Bing AI to 'Tell a joke about Bill Gates' and he hasn't been the same since.

EU countries are taking a different approach. They’re passing regulation that isn’t entirely feasible to comply with and assigning large % global revenue fines for non compliance. Their plan is to just skim revenue and benefit rather than banning.

So that's why MS invested heavily in chatgpt...

This maybe a long shot, but I would like to put a device similar to Alexa or Ok Google in a nursery for a child. I would also like to record several hours of me reading books. However, I like the capability of a device like the two I mentioned before to be able to play random sounds, or give information on demand. Is it possible to have these device store playlist or sounds that I make or are there any devices that can do what I mentioned .

Not true the timeline for that is in 2025.

Any anyone working for any company in the government or a contractor’s supply chain, or anyone providing critical services for any of those companies, even the second-order ones.

Which is essentially every vaguely important company in the US.

He knows this because his barber is an AI

Well, duh. "I'm sorry Bill, I haven't seen a sci-fi movie in the last 60 years!"

While Gates acknowledges that AI has the potential to do great good, depending on government intervention, he is equally concerned by the potential harms.

In his blog post, Gates drew attention to an interaction he had with AI in September. He wrote that, to his astonishment, the AI received the highest possible score on an AP Bio exam.

The AI was asked, “what do you say to a father with a sick child?” It then provided an answer which, Gates claims, was better than one anyone in the room could have provided. The billionaire did not include the answer in his blog post.

This interaction, Gates said, inspired a deep reflection on the way that AI will impact industry and the Gates Foundation for the next 10 years.

He explained that “the amount of data in biology is very large, and it’s hard for humans to keep track of all the ways that complex biological systems work. There is already software that can look at this data, infer what the pathways are, search for targets on pathogens, and design drugs accordingly.”

He predicted that AI will eventually be able to predict side effects and the correct dosages for individual patients.

In the field of agriculture, Gates insisted that “AIs can help develop better seeds based on local conditions, advise farmers on the best seeds to plant based on the soil and weather in their area, and help develop drugs and vaccines for livestock.”

>The negative potential for AI

Despite all the potential good that AI can do, Gates warned that it can have negative effects on society.

“Governments and philanthropy will need to play a major role in ensuring that it reduces inequity and doesn’t contribute to it. This is the priority for my own work related to AI," he wrote.

Gates acknowledged that AI will likely be “so disruptive [that it] is bound to make people uneasy” because it “raises hard questions about the workforce, the legal system, privacy, bias, and more.”

AI is also not a flawless system, he explained, because “AIs also make factual mistakes and experience hallucinations.”

Gates emphasized that there is a “threat posed by humans armed with AI” and the potential that AI “decide that humans are a threat, conclude that its interests are different from ours, or simply stop caring about us?”

Theres someone younger that made a device which essentially lets you play video games with your mind, so instead of using controllers you use your mind.

So yeah these politicians will have a worse time trying to understand this than they did with facebook.

I like the part where everyone in this thread is cool with it, as though it’s okay that China is systematically interweaving itself into American society and we’re good with rolling over and accepting it. That’s not a lukewarm effort to be a xenophobe, it’s a legitimate concern about cultural/community pride. Simple acceptance of another country “doing it better” shouldn’t be where it ends. Follow not just the money but the data stream and then you begin to understand the political and social ramifications of changing minds and hearts that ‘China isn’t bad, it’s the U.S. that’s not good’ and their attempt at the reframing of reality.

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 93%. (I'm a bot)

> A poll of more than 2,000 social media users in China found that about four in 10 respondents have experienced some form of online abuse.

> Her death is the latest in a string of deaths that have been linked to online bullying in China.

> "China has robust technological tools for monitoring online content. More of those resources should be redirected toward curbing cyberbullying. should not condone the culture of fostering online 'hate campaigns'," says Jonathan Sullivan, a China specialist and political scientist at the University of Nottingham.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: online^#1 China^#2 bullied^#3 social^#4 media^#5

> Every time a book is checked out in a library, the library pays,

At least in this country (USA) this is not the case.

A security expert estimated 7-30 million were hit by their last breech while the company said it was only 10k so I went with 2.5m. 🤷‍♂️

[deleted]

The FTC regularly fines and issues consent decrees, and has done so for literally decades…..

it sounds like advertising, but without the requirement it be marked as advertising. In theory it would also get around ad block software.

only what is being "advertised" is the posts of Elon simps, and a generic collection of right wing arse holes.

Because it supposedly comes with a ranking boost (and if you are a Musk fan, the thrill of sending money to your hero), but if it is visible you can get mocked.

you mean the thing I keep skipping on other sites?