Recent comments in /f/springfieldMO

GundleFly t1_jd2nwe8 wrote

I remember seeing him the first time and thinking holy shit! because it was a literal shock. Having gone to the Blue Room dozens of times since, it has just gotten to the point that it’s uncomfortable (like you said). He recycles the same jokes about tampons, lesbians, and fictitious sexual escapades, and it can really wear the audience thin.

16

You_Ate_The_Bones t1_jd2hkb4 wrote

The no more than 3 unrelated is broken by tenants and developers. There are a number of builders who have built 4 bedroom units along Cherry Street, just a few blocks from MSU campus. The single-family neighborhood has a neighborhood organization and they spoke out against this development, fearing that college housing was going to take over swaths of their neighborhood. They literally used this law, stating the city can’t be allowing developers to build units with more than 3 bedrooms. The city council still green-lit the developers and the 4 unit developments have been open now for 5 years without any city code violations presented to the property owners or the tenants. The law is unenforced and will likely be removed or amended.

3

ChewML t1_jd2brum wrote

LKQ Remanufacturing

Day shift only 6am to 4:30pm

Monday through Thursday, some half day Fridays for overtime. No Saturdays or Sundays.

16.80 starting pay, 80 hours PTO starting, good insurance

No experience necessary, no drug test

2720 N Airport Commerce

9

Low_Tourist t1_jd28gwe wrote

Reply to comment by spewdy in Springfield Tenant Laws by [deleted]

I mean, the cops aren't coming and doing a headcount, but most landlords or property management places are gonna invoke that super quick when you show up with 5 people under 21.

8

Low_Tourist t1_jd28aar wrote

Reply to comment by JaredUmm in Springfield Tenant Laws by [deleted]

Springfieldmo.gov has a PDF on their site that states

Each lease or rental contract entered into
regarding rental housing containing one or two
units which is zoned R-SF or R-TH and is located
in the designated neighborhood areas shall
contain the following language:
“Occupancy limited to one family or
three unrelated people, or one family
or four related people as determined by
the zoning classification of the
property.”
This language shall be posted on all such rental
property. Failure to comply with this section
shall render the occupancy permit null and
void.
(G.O. No. 6409, § 1, 11-27-2017)

3

JaredUmm t1_jd24voj wrote

I’m a property manager, and I’m not aware of this cap you refer to. Management companies can set up a rule like that for their leases, but do you mean there is a city ordinance that only applies to certain zones within the city?

1

Low_Tourist t1_jd1q756 wrote

We have basically no renter's protections.

The unrelated thing is often used to prevent people from renting. As is the one/two people per bedroom law.

12

sourdoughbreadlover t1_jd1fbn6 wrote

I briefly worked at Kraft. They had 2nd shift or third shift. Unless someone retired or was otherwise removed from 1st shift, it was very difficult to get on.

They also go by seniority for when a 1st shift opens up.

Good luck out there!

9

Stat63 t1_jd17ado wrote

Agree 100%. For those who are not familiar with the Vecino Group, please check them out. I have had the pleasure of doing some work for them on several past projects, and each one was beneficial to the community involved…which is literally one of the requirements for any project to be approved. Bruce is a very nice person.

3