Recent comments in /f/space
PatFluke t1_je2nfqi wrote
Reply to comment by mooimafish33 in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
Really? I haven’t read it but have been told I should. They spin the moon?
PistolNinja t1_je2neiz wrote
Reply to comment by LaunchTransient in Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
You can mimic the same effect with a DSLR camera. Take a shot of anything with the aperture wide open, let's say say f1.2. Then without changing anything else, tighten the aperture to f5.6 or higher and the image will be WAY darker.
[deleted] t1_je2mx0u wrote
Reply to comment by _themaninacan_ in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
lessthanabelian t1_je2mdr3 wrote
Reply to comment by seanflyon in German launch startup Isar secures €155M in Series C funding. The company has now raised more than €300M by AndrewParsonson
So, exactly what I said, miscategorizing costs.
​
Engine development is part of F9 vehicle development.
seanflyon t1_je2m570 wrote
Reply to comment by lessthanabelian in German launch startup Isar secures €155M in Series C funding. The company has now raised more than €300M by AndrewParsonson
You should actually read that link. That $300 million figure is for Falcon vehicle 9 development. It does not include Dragon development, engine development, or building launch sites and factories.
You are thinking about the COTS contract that included developing Falcon 9, developing Dragon, and multiple launches.
mooimafish33 t1_je2lw6j wrote
Reply to comment by PatFluke in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
I too have read the expanse
[deleted] t1_je2llwv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je2l60s wrote
Reply to comment by SodHawk in Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
[removed]
bkpeach t1_je2l4h9 wrote
Reply to comment by rtphokie in Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
It's fine, I'm not interested in seeing Uranus. Ever. Especially not with a telescope or binoculars.
[deleted] t1_je2kpuz wrote
Reply to comment by DreamWithinAMatrix in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
mikemil828 t1_je2jwhc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Department of the Air Force Secretary: ‘Haven’t made a decision on U.S. Space Command’ by Corbulo2526
Counter-point: Who would want to relocate to Alabama if they are already living in Colorado?
DanYHKim t1_je2jriy wrote
Reply to comment by kudzubug in Water is trapped in glass beads on the moon's surface, lunar samples show by SaraShane
True. They are, I think, basically glass beads with pores to sequester adsorbed water, and so are largely chemically inert.
LaunchTransient t1_je2jqny wrote
Reply to comment by Micke_xyz in Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
Yes, human eyes are amazing - but note that they cannot observe both phenomena at the same time. In sunlight, your irises constrict a lot and it's still dazzling - under a night sky they quadruple in diameter, so that's an 16:1 ratio when they fully dilate to when they fully constrict.
I doubt you could be able to gather enough light to see stars at full constriction, and your retina would be utterly overwhelmed if you tried viewing the sun with a fully dilated iris.
canadave_nyc t1_je2jitd wrote
Reply to comment by killinghorizon in Everyone talks about how huge Andromeda will look in the sky billions of years from now. I present you what the Milky Way *currently* looks like in the skies of our neighbor, the Large Magellanic Cloud. We appear absolutely huge in their skies! [Simulated view] by lampiaio
Hmmm, that's odd--I tested it and it was broken for me too, but I just tried again and it seems to be working. Maybe it was temporarily down?
[deleted] t1_je2jbky wrote
Reply to comment by DanYHKim in Water is trapped in glass beads on the moon's surface, lunar samples show by SaraShane
[deleted]
CaptainKink t1_je2j8ac wrote
Reply to comment by Orffen in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
One acre of land covered with water one foot deep. One step short of just calculating total volume. Much simpler to work with for the farmers.
thara209 t1_je2j38h wrote
Reply to comment by Andromeda321 in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
If you don’t mind me asking, What kind of better localize events?
Neonvaporeon t1_je2ivgw wrote
Reply to comment by Orffen in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
Plants generally capture water through their roots which typically spread evenly in all directions, water travels down through the soil until it hits a ledge then travels along its path (called percolation.) That means a rough measure of the amount of water is plenty to guage requirements for shallow rooted plants, like most food crops. An acre is a measure of area and a foot is a measure of length, combined those give the 3 dimensions to make volume. Water is sold by volume, and for agricultural purposes that is the measure it is sold by to farms (typically.)
[deleted] t1_je2igxq wrote
Reply to comment by nirurin in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
_Jam_Solo_ t1_je2i8wc wrote
Reply to comment by dirtballmagnet in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
What's weird about the moon, is there is no atmosphere, so, it's like having no water for things to float in. Things that might normally float here, like water vapour, would just fall to the ground on the moon, and only float over whatever else happens to be down there from the explosion.
I'm not sure how useful your system would be though. I feel like the amount of time and energy you'd need to spend melting the regolith and collecting the gasses and whatnot, might be excessive in comparison to the amount of water you'd get. Also, I'd imagine you'd get different results from different impacts. Some impacts might be quite water rich, and others no water at all. But even the water rich ones, might not be rich enough for this to be a viable method of collecting enough water for anything.
[deleted] t1_je2i89j wrote
Reply to comment by dirtballmagnet in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je2hz6n wrote
Reply to comment by lessthanabelian in German launch startup Isar secures €155M in Series C funding. The company has now raised more than €300M by AndrewParsonson
[removed]
DreamWithinAMatrix t1_je2ht6g wrote
Reply to comment by dirtballmagnet in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
What is sinter?
Orffen t1_je2hoak wrote
Reply to comment by Neonvaporeon in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
But a foot is a measurement of length isn’t it? Why would you describe a volume of water using feet?
[deleted] t1_je2oddm wrote
Reply to More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[deleted]