Recent comments in /f/space
FaintDeftone t1_je2cf9t wrote
Those aren’t beads, that’s reptilian overlord food.
pinkshotgun1 t1_je2by1t wrote
Reply to comment by uid_0 in Damaged Russian Soyuz Capsule Returns to Earth — Roscosmos by Newgripper1221
According to an insider (so take it with a pinch of salt) if there had been people on board it would have been over 50C. No humans meant lower temperatures, but still rather toasty
Edit: it was Moscow Mission Control who said this, so probably accurate
kudzubug t1_je2bp43 wrote
Reply to comment by DanYHKim in Water is trapped in glass beads on the moon's surface, lunar samples show by SaraShane
I think the reason silica gel packets say do not eat is because they're a choking hazard, not because they're toxic.
TruthSpeakin t1_je2bot7 wrote
Reply to comment by Andromeda321 in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
I understand about 37% of that...but it sounds pretty cool...
farmdve t1_je2axx4 wrote
Are you all subscribed to WSJ? I saw no one mentioning the cut off article and the big sign saying I need to pay.
TheBaenAddict t1_je2aw0x wrote
Reply to comment by lessthanabelian in German launch startup Isar secures €155M in Series C funding. The company has now raised more than €300M by AndrewParsonson
It's actually a generous amount for a company at this stage. SpaceX spent 300M over 4.5 years to build the Falcon 9.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130328121051/http://www.spacex.com/usa.php
OizAfreeELF t1_je2a9z0 wrote
Reply to comment by dirtballmagnet in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
Like Mandalore?
johnla t1_je2a60u wrote
Reply to comment by Negative_Gravitas in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
Yea.... me too.. I totally understood all of that. Why don't you ELI5 for the people who don't understand it. Unlike you and me. HAHA. Because we understand it completely.
pikabuddy11 t1_je29va2 wrote
Reply to comment by loulan in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
On another hand we used to always joke in my graduate astronomy department that if an article was published in Nature then it was wrong.
[deleted] t1_je29re3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
[removed]
Suitable-Victory-105 OP t1_je29o2l wrote
Reply to comment by Ritari_Assa-arpa in Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
Thank you for writing this. Makes a lot more sense now.
Ritari_Assa-arpa t1_je28wr9 wrote
Reply to Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
When looking sky during daytime our atmosfare makes sky blue, which means there is some matter what effects way we see sky and space. When taking pics shooting parameters are adjusted to get best possible, or wanted, outcome to taken pic; ISO, shutter speed, aperture. If you take on the moon sky will appear black.
However, if you take pic about sky from moon it shouldnt matter if its moons day or night. Sun might lit whole moon, but without atmosfare there cant be same light pollution we have on earth. Same goes if you are on space walk, facing away from earth, moon and sun, there is nothing to reflect sun light since its empty vacuum. There cant be light pollution which will effect taken pic. Then it should be possible to take picture of all stars when you adjust settings right for stars and you are back against sun, earth and moon.
There is another way to think this over; when we are on earth during night we see sky as black, full of stars (depending on light pollution here on earth), but night for us, on dark side of earth, is illusion created by body of earth. Night sky we see is only partially shadowed by earth body, and space around that shadow is full of sun light, we just dont see it because there is nothing to reflect it to us.
Since earth is "round" we can play with idea we are precisely middle of the night on middle of calm pacific ocean. This means you are looking sky from surface of ball limited only horizon and you are from your point of view, middle of the night, at the "highest point' of that ball, earth precisely between you and sun. We all know how light goes straight line from sun, and night is just shadow created by body of earth, and this means sky around horizon cant be in earths shadow. Still we can see those stars. Sun doesnt wash away stars, but during night time without lit atmosfare we see clearly what space looks like.
[deleted] t1_je28wqh wrote
Reply to My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
[removed]
greatstarguy t1_je28kfp wrote
Reply to comment by maulinrouge in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
Imagine crushing a Snickers bar in your hand. Your body heat makes it softer, and when you squeeze it, the filling comes out.
That’s basically what they’re proposing. Heat and compress moon rocks to get the water and oxygen out of them, and you can use those for life support and the leftover slag for building things. If it’s all solar-powered, it’s a lot more convenient than other methods.
The sticking point here is how much we’ll be able to get out of these rocks, and how useful the leftover slag is.
[deleted] t1_je28847 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
mmixLinus t1_je282wq wrote
Reply to Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
Take a shoe outside during a sunny day and take a picture of it.
At night, take a picture of the Moon.
What do these images have in common? They are both of sunlight reflected once, which means they were taken using the same settings!
So anything sunlit in space is going to be so bright you will have to lower the exposure settings to not get an over-exposed image, which will also result in no stars, as they are so much weaker.
dusty545 t1_je27zo8 wrote
Reply to Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
Go through Thomas Pesquet's flicker account and look for the nighttime photos where the ISS is in the dark.
PandaEven3982 t1_je27u7h wrote
Reply to comment by Andromeda321 in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
Smiles and nods. Right now, our understanding of EM phenomenon greatly outstrips our understanding of mass/gravity by multiple orders of magnitude. All of our understanding of gravity is phenomenology.
Can we wait till the math improves? :-)
Joeva8me t1_je278gm wrote
Is this the shit that’s supposed to help me lose weight?
OnlyAstronomyFans t1_je26jto wrote
Reply to comment by Suitable-Victory-105 in Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
You mean night?
svarogteuse t1_je26e01 wrote
Reply to comment by Suitable-Victory-105 in Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
Yes. However you also likely need a camera taking a longer exposure or with a more sensitive sensor that those use for daylight photos, just like you need on Earth.
No-Inspector9085 t1_je264m5 wrote
Reply to comment by flamenode in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
I thought this was an insult and was surprised when I clicked the link it wasn’t a page stuck in the early 90s
Obvious_Cranberry607 t1_je25wqd wrote
Reply to Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
The ones you are talking about are adjusted to properly expose an object that is brighter than the stars, which means the stars will usually be too dim to notice. If you look at some pictures of dim objects, like the Earth at night from the ISS (https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/Videos/CrewEarthObservationsVideos/) you can definitely see the stars.
[deleted] t1_je25whr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je2cf9w wrote
Reply to Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
[removed]