Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_jdrsojk wrote
[deleted]
Jig_2000 t1_jdrshks wrote
Reply to My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
Looks like the inside of Darth Vader's Meditation Chamber
Resident_081 t1_jdrs70a wrote
Reply to A hyper-coloured painting of an Atlas V launch that I finished last week, I thought you guys might enjoy it on your Pics allowed Sunday. by LessThanConvinced
Outstanding color pallet. Something about dreamy clouds like this always make my mind wander. Excellent work!
tomtrauberty t1_jdrrw7p wrote
Reply to comment by astro_pettit in My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
Thanks for sharing. Amazing photos, especially the star trails
[deleted] t1_jdrrpqv wrote
Anthony_Pelchat t1_jdrqpkl wrote
Reply to comment by FTR_1077 in Rocket Lab targets $50 million launch price for Neutron rocket to challenge SpaceX’s Falcon 9 by cnbc_official
You are making up crap in your head. Look, 3 execs confirmed at multiple different times in multiple different interviews the cost. People have also gone through to verify numbers as best as possible. The Execs have no reason to lie. And reuse is not some gimmick. It's actually making a meaningful difference. Not just price, but cadence.
And yes, we do know the funding reasons. They specifically made a big deal about both Starlink and Starship. Plus we can see with our own eyes the huge production being done. Factories ain't cheap, nor is the huge amount of construction for Starship and the massive number of satellites for Starlink.
And of course common sense clearly shows that reuse is making a huge financial difference. If it wasn't, they wouldn't have reduced the cost of reusable launches, they wouldn't push customers towards reused rockets, and they wouldn't fly Starlink missions entirely on reused boosters. You are effectively accusing SpaceX of being a pyramid scheme when it clearly isn't.
jocax188723 t1_jdrppho wrote
Reply to My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
That’s really interesting, Don. I’ve always wondered how most of the photos from the Cupola don’t get glare from the inside, and here’s the answer.
Very cool.
[deleted] t1_jdrovh9 wrote
[removed]
cah4732308 t1_jdrnom2 wrote
Reply to My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
amazing! So glad you could be where you are to use your craft to out-of-this-world ends!
GunzAndCamo t1_jdrmxgj wrote
Reply to My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
I've heard that one application for a future commercial space station would be an orbital sound stage for Hollywood types to literally fly cast and crew to orbit to film proper zero-G scenes in actual zero-G conditions. I imagine you're going the sort of advance-work for how to do camera-work in space.
Artful_Dodger29 t1_jdrmmu3 wrote
Reply to Latest video of the Ingenuity Mars Helicopter kicking up dust and taking off for Flight #47. Ingenuity is well beyond its warranty at this point. The video was captured by the Mastcam-Z imager aboard NASA’s Perseverance rover on March 9, 2023. by ICumCoffee
Most people can’t grasp the enormity of an accomplishment like this. It’s just too big. In fact there are some who resent what this suggests about their plodding lives on earth. But the vast majority are in awe and wonder and it helps to elevate us all
[deleted] t1_jdrmhga wrote
Rhaedas t1_jdrlzvf wrote
Reply to comment by danielravennest in [NASA on Twitter] Newly-discovered asteroid 2023 DZ2 will pass Earth more than 100,000 miles (161,000 km) away–about half the distance to the Moon–making its close approach at 3:51 p.m. EDT (12:51 p.m. PDT) by ICumCoffee
Both impressive and the results of Atlas since operation shows it's doing a great job. A space-based telescope system would be able to do so much more, especially since it wouldn't have the limitations of only scanning the night sky that a ground one does. A key point - any impactor that is in a orbit similar to Earth's is that the last years of its path will be from the Sun side of the planet. The sooner we see anything and can calculate mass and vectors the sooner we can do any action that we might be able to do. Another key point - to be able to do anything like deflection we have to get to the object first long before its arrival, so knowing years in advance is crucial.
[deleted] t1_jdrlb5k wrote
[removed]
PoisonWaffle3 t1_jdrkkyu wrote
Reply to comment by JCB_2112 in The image was created by shots photographer Jon Carmichael took while flying at 39,000 feet on a Southwest flight from Portland, Oregon, to St. Louis. Credit: Jon Carmichael by Davicho77
That's pretty cool, but not it.
I'm about 80% sure it was something that NASA (or perhaps another government agency) put together. They made a huge deal about it being in HD at the time (the first polar solar eclipse captured in HD from an airplane). I want to say they flew two planes and got it from two different angles, and chased the eclipse to experience totality for a bit longer.
It's kind of weird that I can't find it now. It's one of the things that got me really interested in astronomy when I was in high school.
[deleted] t1_jdrkbjz wrote
[deleted] t1_jdrjxeg wrote
[deleted] t1_jdrjt7y wrote
[deleted] t1_jdrjphf wrote
Reply to comment by Zachf1986 in My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
[removed]
collegefurtrader t1_jdrjhtk wrote
Reply to comment by tribblydribbly in Wondering if anybody knows what I saw in roughly the fall of 2005. by tribblydribbly
Yea I saw one once, very cool
dark_LUEshi t1_jdrje80 wrote
Reply to comment by astro_pettit in My camera setup on the International Space station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
I can't even begin to imagine how it must feel to be at the pinnacle of so many things while also being able to do something you love.
This truly must feel like having the best toys in the entire world.
[deleted] t1_jdrj8rh wrote
tribblydribbly OP t1_jdrj87j wrote
Reply to comment by collegefurtrader in Wondering if anybody knows what I saw in roughly the fall of 2005. by tribblydribbly
I think you solved it! Watched a couple videos of very bright short lived ones and that pretty much matches what I saw. What a lucky time and place to look up.
Litalian t1_jdrt89f wrote
Reply to what will actually happen when we finally collide with Andromeda? by Wardog_Razgriz30
Distances between stars in a galaxy are so great that it will be near impossible for most stars or planets to collide. Though a few are likely to. We would almost surely still have our Sol And solar system as it has always been, just probably much farther from the center of our new galaxy than we were in our old. And this would apply to almost the entire galaxy. It would not be nearly as destructive as you probably imagine.
Edit to say that the most destructive part of the collision would likely be the force of gravity launching some entire stars, planets, and solar systems out of orbit entirely. Off into the darkness of space to freeze and float forever. This is also an unlikely scenario for 99% of both galaxies, but it’s still going to happen to some of them.