Recent comments in /f/singularity

CertainMiddle2382 t1_je4l8sk wrote

In most mature industries their role is to manage status quo and tune the monopoly they invariably achieved by keeping good contacts with fellow cartel members and take care of allies in gouvernement.

Their also have to maintain friendly proximity with fellow McKinsey gents in commercial banks that will finance anything that doesn’t require financing.

That is their true job, and that will remain for a little while IMO.

1

Arowx OP t1_je4kag3 wrote

My limited understanding is that the AIs need to be trained before they can be used.

They are working towards AIs that can learn and, on the fly, it would be a huge jump in capabilities. And put the first company that does it ahead of everyone else.

2

answermethis0816 t1_je4jwfm wrote

I think the end goal is not to extend the life of our (inherently flawed and limited) biological bodies, but to replace them.

We aren't going to explore & colonize space in fragile meat bags that require food, water, air, stable pressure, gravity, and temperature. Even on Earth, supporting a ballooning population isn't going to be easy.

The goal is to digitize consciousness, and there is still a lot to figure out before we get there. I don' think it's possible to make human bodies as we know them "immortal"

9

cant-say-less-info t1_je4gn56 wrote

The CEO of my old company is just doing PR stuff, I don’t think they do have or usually claim to have the expertise over HOD’s. Their job is to figure out what BOD wants and BOD chose him to represent their interests. It’s a power and trust position so it may not work for many companies to rely on AI in such cases.

2

Sure_Cicada_4459 t1_je4fln6 wrote

It reeks of sour grapes, not only are many of the signature fake which straight up puts this into at best shady af territory but there is literally zero workable plan after 6 months, hell even during it. No criteria as to what is "enough" pause and who decides them. And that also ignores that PAUSING DOESN'T WORK, there are all kinds of open source models out there and the tech is starting to move away from large = better. It's FOMO + desperate power grab + neurotic unfalsifiable fears. I am not saying x-risk is 0, but drastic action need commensurate evidence. I get tail risks are hard to get evidence for in advance, but we have seen so many ridiculous claims of misalignment like people coaxing ChatGPT or Bing into no-no talk and people claiming "It's aggressively misaligned", and yet at the very same time saying "It's hallucinating and doesn't understand anything abt reality". Everything abt this signals to me motivated reasoning, fears of obsolence, and projection of one's own demon onto a completely alien class of mind.

13

Nexus888888 t1_je4f4t3 wrote

I guess what we saw in Ready Player One is kind of Agenda…

Suddenly no long time after came the rise of crypto, the hype and the boom, society went deep on digitalisation and the COVID 19 3 years ago set the isolation at a survival level. Then started to be around Musk as a prophet of XXIst century with the promise of a brilliant future, now we have the setting of a French Revolution 3.0 here with the economic environment destroyed and the faith and hopes of the people at their lowest. And we come back to Ready Player One, where the people moves minimally from their environments, lives with minimum supplies and past the most of their days in a virtual reality. We could call it Reddit 3.0

1