Recent comments in /f/singularity
signed7 t1_je4lke6 wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlet_pot2 in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
There are some DeepMind names there
Edit: also some Google names further down
Edit2: even some Microsoft names further down, just SWEs and not researchers though
signed7 t1_je4le7c wrote
CertainMiddle2382 t1_je4l8sk wrote
Reply to Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
In most mature industries their role is to manage status quo and tune the monopoly they invariably achieved by keeping good contacts with fellow cartel members and take care of allies in gouvernement.
Their also have to maintain friendly proximity with fellow McKinsey gents in commercial banks that will finance anything that doesn’t require financing.
That is their true job, and that will remain for a little while IMO.
[deleted] t1_je4l6rw wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_je4l0go wrote
It’s hard to imagine a world where people don’t age in a world where there isn’t relatively infinite abundance for all. The world is already total shit for billions of humans
And…. traffic
Arowx OP t1_je4kzh3 wrote
Reply to comment by Artanthos in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
Or could they use GPT-5 or 6 to be their lawyer.
Or is that the global courts or could GPT move to another country to get around legal holdups?
Arowx OP t1_je4kpnz wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
What if AI allows us to use it as a tool to faster approach AGI?
It's kind of like the chicken and egg problem. What came first the AGI or the AI toolkit that allowed the AGI to evolve faster from an AI?
Ginkotree48 t1_je4kmly wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Yeah it will only cost $600,000 no big deal guys!
Arowx OP t1_je4kag3 wrote
Reply to comment by knowitstime in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
My limited understanding is that the AIs need to be trained before they can be used.
They are working towards AIs that can learn and, on the fly, it would be a huge jump in capabilities. And put the first company that does it ahead of everyone else.
Scarlet_pot2 t1_je4k2jx wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
No one from OpenAi or Deepmind signed it, neither did Microsoft CEO. I'm interpreting this letter as the others saying "slow down so we can catch up and get a piece of the cake" to the big players
answermethis0816 t1_je4jwfm wrote
I think the end goal is not to extend the life of our (inherently flawed and limited) biological bodies, but to replace them.
We aren't going to explore & colonize space in fragile meat bags that require food, water, air, stable pressure, gravity, and temperature. Even on Earth, supporting a ballooning population isn't going to be easy.
The goal is to digitize consciousness, and there is still a lot to figure out before we get there. I don' think it's possible to make human bodies as we know them "immortal"
welshpudding t1_je4jqg2 wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
An interesting nod to the increasing importance of verifying identify online.
1a1b t1_je4jmho wrote
Reply to Commentary of the Future of Life Institute's Open Letter, and Why Emad Mostaque (Stability AI CEO) Likely Signed it by No-Performance-8745
Isn't this a fake thing? No-one has admitted that they have anything to do with this.
drizel t1_je4iwtf wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
GPT-4 made the letter. It's playing 4D chess to keep the funding flowing.
Scarlet_pot2 t1_je4ia9h wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
It's real for gary marcus, check his twitter. a comment said they verified its true with musk and emad too.
arckeid t1_je4hrpn wrote
Reply to comment by arisalexis in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
Shit's looking weird for sure.
garden_frog t1_je4hgym wrote
Reply to comment by S3ndD1ckP1cs in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
Please cure aging 🙏
cant-say-less-info t1_je4gn56 wrote
Reply to comment by fluffy_assassins in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
The CEO of my old company is just doing PR stuff, I don’t think they do have or usually claim to have the expertise over HOD’s. Their job is to figure out what BOD wants and BOD chose him to represent their interests. It’s a power and trust position so it may not work for many companies to rely on AI in such cases.
Neurogence OP t1_je4fs3d wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
Lol that takes the cake 🤣🤣
Sure_Cicada_4459 t1_je4fln6 wrote
Reply to Commentary of the Future of Life Institute's Open Letter, and Why Emad Mostaque (Stability AI CEO) Likely Signed it by No-Performance-8745
It reeks of sour grapes, not only are many of the signature fake which straight up puts this into at best shady af territory but there is literally zero workable plan after 6 months, hell even during it. No criteria as to what is "enough" pause and who decides them. And that also ignores that PAUSING DOESN'T WORK, there are all kinds of open source models out there and the tech is starting to move away from large = better. It's FOMO + desperate power grab + neurotic unfalsifiable fears. I am not saying x-risk is 0, but drastic action need commensurate evidence. I get tail risks are hard to get evidence for in advance, but we have seen so many ridiculous claims of misalignment like people coaxing ChatGPT or Bing into no-no talk and people claiming "It's aggressively misaligned", and yet at the very same time saying "It's hallucinating and doesn't understand anything abt reality". Everything abt this signals to me motivated reasoning, fears of obsolence, and projection of one's own demon onto a completely alien class of mind.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je4fiaq wrote
Reply to comment by foobazzler in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Yeah, I'm curious about how CEOs will fight it more than anything. Power structures are gonna flip in their heads.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je4ff2t wrote
Reply to comment by cant-say-less-info in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Fine with me, but I'd love for that to be all they do. The board of directors will probably be replaced to when AI is better at profiting the shareholders...
Focused-Joe t1_je4f7bt wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
What they are preparing you and saying is: That's All folks ! We'll continue our work behind closed doors
Nexus888888 t1_je4f4t3 wrote
I guess what we saw in Ready Player One is kind of Agenda…
Suddenly no long time after came the rise of crypto, the hype and the boom, society went deep on digitalisation and the COVID 19 3 years ago set the isolation at a survival level. Then started to be around Musk as a prophet of XXIst century with the promise of a brilliant future, now we have the setting of a French Revolution 3.0 here with the economic environment destroyed and the faith and hopes of the people at their lowest. And we come back to Ready Player One, where the people moves minimally from their environments, lives with minimum supplies and past the most of their days in a virtual reality. We could call it Reddit 3.0
GenoHuman t1_je4m047 wrote
Reply to If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Why 50 years? Why not opt for like 10 yrs? 😂