if what u say is true, and it happens, will my life get worse becuz of it? or better?

will anti-aging medicine and morphological freedom still be available in my lifetime if this “neoliberal technological dystopia” thing happens?

edit: than ku 4 writin this post btw

We've got Wolfram at home

Actually, I think you're right and they did mention it. I guess I wish they would have emphasized that aspect more than the 'sparks of general intelligence'. It's mostly a solid paper for what it is. They admit they don't know what the training data looks like. I just wish they would have left that paragraph about the sparks out of it.

I'm not reading that

I'm happy for you

Or sorry that happened

6 x 6

Don't worry,these problems won't even last a year

This must mean that it is intentional, as in governments are aware of this and for whatever reason have not done anything to improve the situation for the ever expanding lower classes.

​

Or maybe one party has just refused to govern for the last 20 years.

​

calm down.

I'm pretty sure they mentioned something like that in passing didn't they? I know they have a section in there talking about how it fails at some math and language problems because it can't plan ahead, and it can't make leaps of logic. And it considered these substantial problems with ChatGPT4 with no obvious fix.

it has yet to be seen if current language models will be capable of creating software as well as humans. due to training datasets being based on human text, it's limited in it's intelligence. it may require new breakthroughs or a different pathway to reach something equivalent to AGI. certainly this view is not uncommon among AI researchers, so maybe you should try yourself to be understanding of different views, rather than blindly believing LLMs will eclipse humans shortly

Well it is still constrained to that data set. Its not training on this browser data its just using the 2021 data set to make sense of it.

I think we're seeing the first signs of things accelerating exponentially through natural language coding tools that are descended from GPTs. Case in point would be OpenAI's codex, based on GPT3, which powers Github's Copilot and now Copilot X (GPT4?). Github Copilot is an AI 'pair programmer' that helps the coder write code. These tools are available as extensions in Integrated Development Environments (IDE's) that are used by developers worldwide.

I'm willing to wager that the developers at OpenAI, and the python/c library developers that GPT is reliant upon such as tensorflow and numpy, are using codex/copilot or vanilla chatgpt4. They'll be using these tools to help them write the next generation of GPTs or their dependencies.

As each new version of tensorflow, numpy, GPT, codex or copilot comes out, it would be interesting to see what percentage of the code-base has been written by an AI. Humans are in the loop for now, but their contributions will be getting smaller over time. As the software development and improvement process becomes more automated, the time between releases will contract.

codex/copilot is being used to write software. All coders will be using copilot or seeking other work. All software will have an every-increasing percentage that has been composed by an AI. And this includes the next version of the AIs and the libraries that they're dependent upon. This has the potential to 'take off' very quickly. Self-improving AI before AGI/ASI. I think the singularity has already begun to be honest - at the very least we're falling into it.

Microsoft may have agreed. In the paper they released that talked about "sparks of AGI" - they identified a number of areas that LLM's fail at. Mostly forward planning and leaps of logic or Eureka moments. They actually pointed at LeCun's paper and said that's a potential solution... but that suggests they can't solve it yet with the ChatGPT approach.

🙏. Love your name btw 🤣

If it really is accelerating exponentially, then most people cheering for this will be out on their arse with no job the next day.

And those that don't lose their job, will lose it shortly afterwards as the next exponential leap comes.

It's amazing tech, but we don't control it, corporations do, and what happens when corporations smell profit?

The same advice I've told people my whole life:

Work on your neuroplasticity, not your knowledge. What you know will become less and less important as technology evolves. How fast you learn to adapt to new circumstances is always far more important than what you think is a stable income or job now.

No advice until they talk to me about it first. I will let them live the time it will take for them to see enough to want to talk to me about it in blissful ignorance. I do not have the skills to help them make hay in the meantime, and don't want to freak them out. If my SO carries on with her teaching course she'll find out soon enough anyway.

> >>We’re literally creating gods > >Settle down.

I read that in Butthead's voice

When covid hit and everyone around the world was in lockdowns it felt like everyone was on the same page dealing with the same problem , if singularity does happen, im trying to figure out the first outcome. How will the world 🌎 react. Is there a plan . Is everything going to crash are we going to be free or are we going to get the iPhone 16 and call it a day .

Indeed.

Oh the horrors you have witnessed.

Have fun and just enjoy the real world when it comes

I think jobs will always exist as long as humans are capable of doing anything better or cheaper than a machine.

Until we get to the point where we have robotic wives and children, there will always be jobs.

Will we? Some say immortality by 2030

CEO's are the media face for the board of directors

>All of your hard work in life was for nothing.

This is so fucking negative. We're all gonna die one day, so should we all just abandon our endeavors because of that?