GPT 3.5 is more than capable of original poetry, stories, jokes, and discussion. I'm not really sure what would be considered "repeating a message", though.

What about the chaos that would brew and explode, it would be rioting on an unprecedented level. The people will likely go on the hunt in numbers that no military or police would even feel right about stopping. Like zombie appocalypse AI smackdown. Seek and destroyyya ha ha ha haaa!!

Lol... Stay delusional

One that its not repeating a message for example

So ask another ChatGPT to assess the truthyness of what the first ChatGPT just wrote. Let them talk to each other, sort out the disagreement, and tell us what they come up with.

Yeah, to add to your point, not just Christians but also Muslims and basically anyone who believes in afterlife... I think they are not normal for believing in completely unfounded and unscientific fairy tales, but they are likely just as vulnerable as people on this sub. They may have lost a loved one or at a desperate situation themselves, so they are not emotionally ready to rationally argue about afterlife. I believe ai will significantly improve our lives and cure Manu diseases but the singularity will not happen in 100 years at least.

I keep saying this but it seems to me that these LLM's are exposing the fact that we aren't as sentient as we thought we were, that the bar is much lower.

If these LLM''s could talk and their data set was the present moment - they'd already be more capable than us.

The problem is no longer scale but speed of input and types of input.

And then it will come for people who literally dig shit. No one is safe. There is no happy future for humanity.

In soviet Russia, job comes for gpt

“Computer bs”

Let me guess, you went to college, became a lawyer and you deliver pizzas for a living.

I’m not sure what you’re going through, but if you ever want to chat feel free to DM me man. I’d love to pick your brain

I will be messaging you in 10 years on 2033-03-28 07:06:16 UTC to remind you of this link

3 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)

I think it's unlikely Alzheimer's won't be solved.

!Remindme 10 years

This is like the "unhackable" iPhone that has a ripped image on BitTorrent two hours after release.

I just read the second article you linked, and it does not provide any scientific basis for the bounds of an intelligence explosion. Given the recent uptrend in AI investment, I'd give 5-10 years before an ASI emerges. Primarily, once AI takes over microprocessor development, it will almost certainly kickstart this explosion.

Most important news of last weeks developments is that even trivial LLM models can produce almost intelligent behaviors, and that even those very simple models escape their makers comprehension.

We can’t even understand pre AGI AI, imagine what is coming…

The black box nature of AI amazes me, it is not that we don’t grasp the details, we have absolutely no clue about what they are capable of, what a technology.

Logical thing is to not do anything to drastic but, I think even if the (singularity) never comes we will live in somewhat of a utopia. People tend to get the singularity confused with other things, the singularity Is a whole other thing, in fact I don't think everyone will be able to or even want to live in the singularity.

Lol what a bizarre request

Like the alleged gods did when creating us

Recursive self improving is trivially exponential (no « singularity » aka limit though).

Singularity comes from our need to extrapolate the past to anticipate the future.

And if the future comes too fast, thr hypothesis is that we won’t be able to do that anymore.

Those exponentials often appear in recursive things, like population biology.

« Singularities » don’t really happen because, at one point, things outside the exponential mechanism start to « push » against it. It could be food, it could be space, it could be speed of light…

The fight between an exponential process and its environment leads to the omnious « logistics curve », better known as S curve.

Maybe something, somewhere will push against AI, limiting it as all other exponential stuff is limited.

For various resons, I don’t think it will happen.

IMO, Singularity is inevitable and will expand in the whole universe.

No, I'm saying right now will not look much different than the 19th century in the future. We invented penicilin and some cool tech, but we're still plagued by all the same miseries. In a future without all these they'll look back and say the same things with even greater certainty about us.

I'm not saying that's the guaranteed future we're headed, no one knows where we're headed. But you see these kind of people dictating others happiness all over the place. Yeah sorry buddy, telling someone to just be happy doesn't help. Telling them to be grateful is even worse when you have no idea what they're going through. It basically boils down to "But someone is having it tougher than you!" Yeah no shit there is. Other peoples misery doesn't help me though.

Hooray! Vindication for my lack of drive and future sense!

There’s honestly no point in drastically changing your life, even if a hard limit stopped further development right this second our lives are going to change In literally unimaginable ways, and sooner than we think

Well, AFAIK there's nothing in history that resembles the singularity. We have evolution, but it took a long time. We can claim that computers are faster than evolution, but that's just something we think is plausible. Humans reproduce every 20+ years, so if computers can do it faster, we're going to witness a cyber evolution.

And add quantum computers. Quantum computers have the potential ability to search exponentially growing space just by adding logical qubits. There's no equivalent in nature of quantum computers AFAIK. This doesn't rule out quantum computers.

The other option is biological computers using neural tissue. This doesn't seem as spectacular as quantum computers but still could potentially beat human evolution. I mean, this is not a religious argument. I'm not trying to prove the existence of God. There could be a path to AGI or not. It's more of an engineering question like can you break the sound barrier?

By the way I don't believe in the literal Singularity. There are many hard limits IMO that would prevent it.

TLDR Singularity might be achievable, but maybe not the literal Singularity. Technology could be developed to get us close.

This is basically a fluff piece inserted into the conversation that worries about the machine bias, the ability for it to do stuff like figure out race by proxy, and possibly use that knowledge to learn biases assumed to be present in its training data.

To be honest, the network can always be run in reverse. If it lights up a "black" label, or whatever, you can ask it to project back to the regions in image which contributed most to that label. That is the part it is looking, in some very real sense. I guess they did that and it lighted up big part of the input, so it is something like diffuse property that nevertheless is systematic enough for the AI to figure out.

Or maybe they didn't know they could do this and just randomly stabbed around in the dark. Who knows. As I said, this is fluff piece that doesn't tell you anything about what these researches were actually doing except doing some image oversaturation tricks, and when that didn't make a dent in machine's ability to identify race, they were apparently flummoxed.