Who else is looking forward to the day when artificial intelligence can effectively diagnose mental health issues and provide personalized interventions without the need for a formal diagnosis? I, for one, am incredibly excited about the possibilities. With the power of AI, we can potentially identify individuals who may be at risk for mental health issues early on and provide targeted interventions to improve their mental wellness. This can't come soon enough for me, and I believe that the future of mental health care will be significantly transformed by the integration of AI technology. (Used chat gpt 3 to help me write this)

exactly. some of us are making the mayority of us, obsolete. could this be the great filter? or at least one of them.

Here's a sneak peek of /r/collapse using the top posts of the year!

#1: The system isn't broken it's working as intended. | 329 comments
#2: We've all got a little something inside of us | 222 comments
#3: Work hard, they said. Get a degree, they said. | 559 comments

^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^Contact ^^| ^^Info ^^| ^^Opt-out ^^| ^^GitHub

Doomers gonna doom. Go to r/collapse if you're only interested in adding your apocalyptic obsession to the conversation.

> This is so wrong I will not bother with the rest of the claims, this author is unqualified

I find these comments pretty amusing. The author you’re referring to is François Chollet, an esteemed and widely published AI researcher whose code you’ve probably used if you’ve ever played around with ML (he created Keras and, as a Google employee, is a key contributor to Tensorflow).

So no, he’s not “unqualified,” and if you think he’s confused about a very basic area of human or machine cognition, you very likely don’t understand his claim, or are yourself confused.

Based on your response, you’re probably a little of both.

Interestingly, considering the vote differences, it appears most people understood.

I second this suggestion. Elevenlabs can recreate the the proper intonation and cadence of the original voice actor.

The way it predicts race is unclear. But once we figure it out; it discovered that difference.

You’re right, I meant to write “Much more than $1,000,000”

I’m just here to point out that “At least $1,000,000” and “More than $1,000,000” are the same thing.

Clicking on your links requires thought and reading and those don’t seem like things the singularity will require of me

You either spend your money expecting a Singularity that never comes, or save your money then watch it become worthless once the Singularity hits.

Screwed either way.

Anything about what it discovered? Or is it just that it can predict race?

Business schools are the worst invention also the worst major you can take. I say that as someone who majored in business. Maybe finance and accounting are OK, but management… wtf are we learning

This might be our ray of hope. With no one model being completely dominant over the others, and these models being widespread, humanity will be able to tip the scales in our preferred direction.

At least, that's how I cope watching an intelligent Bing be given direct internet access..

if we reach human level AGI, why would it stop there? surely people will set AGIs on the task of self improvement and AI development.

Radiology AI's discovered some weird shit. IIRC. They suppressed the news bc it was a bit "racist".

Can an AI be any smarter than its makers at this point?

I've said similar things and at least among the folks I know it lands pretty well/folks seem to want to say that but couldn't find the words. In a really literal way, like the dots just weren't connecting but what they were attempting to communicate was that.

The thing I wonder is how we would tell. Since we can't leave our subjective experience and observe another, I think that means we're stuck never really knowing to a certain degree. Personally I lean toward just taking a sort of functionalist approach, what does it matter if we're ultimately fooling ourselves if the thing behaves and interacts well enough for it not to matter? Or is it the case that, on the whole, our species values itself too highly to really accept that time it outdid itself? I feel like if we avoid some sort of enormous catastrophe, what we'll end up with is some awful, cheap thing that makes you pay for a conversation devoid of product ads.

I don’t know who is cashing out 401k, that’s just stupid. I don’t know exactly what singularity is, but within 10 years your life is not going to be the same, in 25 years you might as well believing 200 years from now if not a 1000.

Maybe Alzheimer’s will be solved.

I think Her (2014) and A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001) are two of the most prescient sci-fi movies created in recent times. One with more positive outlook than the other, but knowing our world, both will come true at the same time. Like I can already picture some redneck crowd taking sick pleasure at destroying androids. You can already see some people on Twitter justifying and hyping their hate for AI or anyone who is positive about it.

I wonder if anybody has included code for that goal yet.

I mean we are already demigods. It's not a huge leap to complete the transformation.

Fire and ice we can kind of see and understand. What even is intelligence?