Recent comments in /f/science

BabyNapsDaddyGames t1_je5h23s wrote

It's a bit more detailed than that, corporations having been bribing (read: lobbying) politicians for decades to erode those laws that would keep them in check. The IRS has been gutted so many times they no longer have the power to pressure the wealthy. For a business to become successful without using all the loopholes is very difficult unless the stars are aligned in the right way.

5

berrytas t1_je5aiy0 wrote

vegans are more likely to be 'rule followers' and engage in other lifestyle behaviors that are considered healthy (e.g., more walks, exercise, less processed foods, generally taking care of oneself). their positive health outcomes may or may not be related to their diet.

it has been shown repeatedly that you cannot control for these confounding lifestyle factors - hence why epidemiology should be step 1, and then you use randomized controlled trials to actually test for only changes in diet (which is obviously very hard to do at any sort of scale over any long time horizon - can't really lock people away for decades).

additionally, comparing a vegan diet consisting of whole, fresh foods to the standard american diet isn't really telling. anything is better than that!

−1

casus_bibi t1_je56zhu wrote

It is a lot easier to get overwhelmed with executive dysfunction, making disruptive (or disobedient) behavior more difficult to deal with. It's very easy to go from zero to 100 if a young child keeps up bad behavior, like loud screaming/singing/noise, or if the kid refuses to clean up their mess (this is already difficult with ED, then add the additional difficulty of time pressure and a child refusing to clean up their toys), if you already warned them and are running out of energy to compensate. It's also relatively easy to attribute malicious intent to the behavior, because you have already warned them that you can't handle it and the behavior continues.

It seems probable to me that these mothers are trying to somewhat protect themselves from being overstimulated and overwhelmed as non compliance can trigger panic attacks, meltdowns, and anxiety.

As they only tested this with mothers of young children, it's possible that this authoritarian parenting style will become less rigid as the child develops more empathy for the needs of their parents, and the domestic noise levels and neediness of the kids lessens.

42

DoctorSeis t1_je526aa wrote

For sure it's more sophisticated. What you are talking about (and what I mentioned for measuring seismic wave propagation) requires a single (very specialized, very expensive) piece of equipment on one end of the fiber that does the sending/receiving and initial processing. However, in the context of using an existing communications network (that is also actively being used with the equipment they already have) I was speculating on how they could possibly detect a "big" disturbance without the same sort of specialty equipment (that we use for precise measurements) already in place. In the case of an early warning system, the measurements need not be that precise when it simply needs to alert folks that a large disturbance has been detected somewhere along the line.

2

Witty_Interaction_77 t1_je50u9m wrote

That's not quite the process... also, you want to exploit people?

The thing about the testing (especially brain testing) is that it's super invasive, many times involving the death of the subject in order to visually see the brain or take samples. Drug testing results in debilitating conditions or death.

Subjecting humans to this would be horrible. Having "depressed people", or "prisoners", or any other human you suggest would be far more ethically and morally bankrupt than testing on the mice.

I think all life is valuable. However, mice reproduce very quickly, they live short lives, they are small one have traits that make them good for observing because they are close to humans, and they are also well... animals.

Humans have an innate need to discover things. Doing it this way is surprisingly the lesser of two evils. No matter what you think of medical animal testing, you've reaped its benefits at some point in your life.

If it makes you feel any better, the scientists are very nice to them.

1

MRCHalifax t1_je4ysx6 wrote

OK, now I’m imagining Scotty watching as all the dials go into the red zone, just being on the comm to the bridge/brain saying “The gut biome is destabilizing, Cap’n! The fibre and sugar ratio is unstable! If this keeps up, we’re goinga blow!”

1

AnOddFad t1_je4yish wrote

We literally have countless depressed humans on earth visiting psychiatrists. All it would take is to give them a brain scan and voila, we have a much better result than this.

And if we’re worried about privacy? Just ask their permission or give a monetary reward. There are bound to be some people willing to help science.

1

Witty_Interaction_77 t1_je4y4z3 wrote

Unfortunately, there isn't. Computer modelling just isn't there. Not to mention, getting natural physical reactions is impossible to model in any form other than observing live specimens in real time.

It's unfortunate. However necessary, unless you're willing to expend human lives to advance research.

1

Wagamaga OP t1_je4xswa wrote

A team of British researchers has made an exciting discovery in the great inky black of space: a gigantic black hole is roughly 30 billion times the mass of our Sun.

Something that large is almost unfathomable to the brain of the Average Joe, but thankfully space boffins at Durham University have been busily studying the cosmos and all the secrets she keeps hidden from us.

The findings, described by the research team as 'extremely exciting' have been published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Durham University Astronomer James Nightingale and lead author of the study said: "This particular black hole is roughly 30 billion times the mass of our Sun.

https://www.unilad.com/news/scientists-discover-one-of-the-biggest-black-holes-ever-291846-20230329

14