Recent comments in /f/science
DataPigeon t1_jdzpi0v wrote
Reply to comment by No-Sock7425 in Forcing dominant mice to lose social status induced depression-like behaviors and reduced pleasure-seeking by Zadarex
Are you a mouse?
Georgie___Best t1_jdzpgwd wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Loss of Menin helps drive the aging process, and dietary supplement can reverse it in mice by geoxol
[deleted] t1_jdznob5 wrote
[deleted] t1_jdzniq4 wrote
Reply to comment by iamfondofpigs in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdzm2wy wrote
WallEx90 t1_jdzlm0p wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
just from personal experience: yes. Its stunning how many redditors are going out of their way to fight for their indefencable opinions.
FadedPoster t1_jdzk8o6 wrote
Reply to comment by iamfondofpigs in Study: CBD Decreases Daytime Drowsiness And Is Associated With A Lower Prevalence Of Low Testosterone Levels In Men by Defiant_Race_7544
Why even publish at that point. Need an independent research group to verify this
WheredMyPiggyGo t1_jdzk4ew wrote
Reply to comment by shogi_x in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
I wonder if the concept that if you're wise enough to know there are things out there that you don't know you will more than likely view the sciences as a positive, of you however believe you know everything already, why would science be valuable to you.
MINIMAN10001 t1_jdzjfe6 wrote
Reply to comment by deaddonkey in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Given the quality I typically see coming from the default subs /r/science survives the plague of being a default sub a lot better than most do.
[deleted] t1_jdzj1e4 wrote
Reply to comment by shogi_x in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdzgwqy wrote
koebelin t1_jdzgdnq wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
There are lots of iffy social science in this sub. People tend to post with click bait titles.
Wagamaga OP t1_jdzfco0 wrote
Reply to Research found among nearly 100 teens who underwent brain scans, those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) tended to have thinner tissue at the brain's surface, and some signs of inflammation in a brain area key to memory and learning. by Wagamaga
Researchers found that among nearly 100 teens who underwent brain scans, those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) tended to have thinner tissue at the brain's surface, and some signs of inflammation in a brain area key to memory and learning.
Exactly what those brain structure differences mean is not yet clear, said senior researcher Dr. Raanan Arens, chief of respiratory and sleep medicine at Children's Hospital at Montefiore in New York City.
But the findings -- recently published in the journal Sleep -- do suggest that OSA can lead to observable alterations in kids' brains.
Studies estimate that anywhere from 1% to 5% of children have obstructive sleep apnea, a disorder in which tissues in the throat constrict during sleep, causing repeated stops and starts in breathing. Loud snoring is the most obvious symptom, but daytime sleepiness and attention problems are also red flags.
AutoModerator t1_jdzf9qv wrote
Reply to Research found among nearly 100 teens who underwent brain scans, those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) tended to have thinner tissue at the brain's surface, and some signs of inflammation in a brain area key to memory and learning. by Wagamaga
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted] t1_jdzeu0l wrote
JadedIdealist t1_jdzd8vj wrote
Reply to comment by BatteryKeyChain in Forcing dominant mice to lose social status induced depression-like behaviors and reduced pleasure-seeking by Zadarex
Sad deposed mouse is sad. If anything sad mouse will become a reddit meme.
[deleted] t1_jdzd8be wrote
Reply to comment by Eqvvi in Research found after six years spent tracking health outcomes among nearly 925,000 Danish seniors, investigators determined that when a man between the ages of 65 and 69 loses his wife he is 70% more likely to die in the year that follows, when compared with his non-widowed peers by Wagamaga
[removed]
and_dont_blink t1_jdzcy5e wrote
Reply to comment by needtofigureshitout in Study Suggests Wild Blueberries Help Burn Fat. Results showed participants burned notably more fat after consuming wild blueberries. For example, fat oxidation rate rose by 19.7%, 43.2%, and 31.1% at 20, 30, and 40 min after cycling. by Wagamaga
>Edit 2: added more stuff because this comment is a horrible analysis of the OP study
needtofigureshitout, you don't seem to be aware that others don't see when you make a bunch of edits to your comments.
>Tart cherry is primarily investigated for recovery, not fat oxidation. Cite your source?
It's literally in the actual published article we're talking about, of which you said my analysis was "horrible" but which I actually read and comprehended. Open the article at the top of the page and search for "cherry." Best of luck.
Edit: Dear lord, this account is brand new, has 13 karma and almost their entire comment history is all over this one story... Interesting.
Are you involved with the study in any way, needtofigureshitout? If so I have some questions about the authorship and how it went from being someone's master's thesis in 2019 to someone else's paper, and how most of their committee ended up as authors?
Sparkysparkysparks t1_jdzc90h wrote
Reply to comment by Copious-GTea in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Dude, that's their research question. You can argue that they could have a different research question but they've used a good method for this one, and its a legitimate research question to have.
Sparkysparkysparks t1_jdzc1eq wrote
Reply to comment by Darwins_Dog in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Yeah - throwing out allegations of corruption should be done very cautiously. Yet you often see people on this sub accusing scientists of corruption, sadly without even reading and understanding the study.
And I strongly doubt many people who have accused the scientists of corruption have contacted the editors because deep down they know their accusations are spurious. I can only imagine how these authors feel when reading this sub....
[deleted] t1_jdzbv9p wrote
wmdolls OP t1_jdz87nq wrote
Reply to comment by Mokebe890 in The Mice with Two Dads: Scientists Create Eggs from Male Cells by wmdolls
Maybe and Perhaps :-)
iamfondofpigs t1_jdz7k7s wrote
Reply to comment by mosenewbell in Study: CBD Decreases Daytime Drowsiness And Is Associated With A Lower Prevalence Of Low Testosterone Levels In Men by Defiant_Race_7544
Sure is.
> Conflict of interest statement
> Robert Kaufmann has served as a consultant for Shaman Botanicals, LLC, and Validcare, LLC, and as a speaker for Shaman Botanicals, LLC. Amber Harris Bozer, Amanda Kube, and Keith Aqua have no conflicts of interest to declare.
> Grant support
> Funding and products for this project were provided by Asterra Labs, Care by Design, CBDistillery, CBD American Shaman, Cannacraft, Charlotte’s Web, Columbia Care, Garden of Life, Global Widget, HempFusion, Impact Naturals, Kannaway, Kazmira, Medterra CBD, Oncuity LLC, SunMed CBD, and Tauriga Sciences.
Sculptasquad t1_jdz744z wrote
Reply to comment by angelicasinensis in Study has shown evidence of a specific pathway of cells and nerves linking the gut to the brain that may be responsible for irritable bowel syndrome and anxiety by giuliomagnifico
"Naturopathy as a whole lacks an adequate scientific basis,[5] and it is rejected by the medical community.[5] Although it includes valid lifestyle advice from mainstream medicine (healthy sleep, balanced diet, regular exercise),[15] it typically adds a range of pseudoscientific beliefs.[22] Some methods rely on immaterial "vital energy fields", the existence of which has not been proven, and there is concern that naturopathy as a field tends towards isolation from general scientific discourse.[22][58][59] Naturopathy is criticized for its reliance on and its association with unproven, disproven, and other controversial alternative medical treatments, and for its vitalistic underpinnings.[15][16] Natural substances known as nutraceuticals show little promise in treating diseases, especially cancer, as laboratory experiments have shown limited therapeutic effect on biochemical pathways, while clinical trials demonstrate poor bioavailability.[60] According to the American Cancer Society, "scientific evidence does not support claims that naturopathic medicine can cure cancer or any other disease".[16] According to Britt Hermes, naturopath student programs are problematic because "As a naturopath [student], you are making justifications to make the rules and to fudge the standards of how to interpret research all along the way. Because if you don't, you're not left with anything, basically".
justingod99 t1_jdzpp84 wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Would love to see these studies released on Reddit attitudes towards bipartisanship, or, God forbid…opinions incongruent with their own.