Recent comments in /f/science
[deleted] t1_jdvtffr wrote
Reply to comment by dumnezero in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvse8t wrote
Reply to comment by dumnezero in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
henryptung t1_jdvs53v wrote
Reply to comment by SoNonGrata in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
>Since when did science, the act of acquiring knowledge through a step by step process to be able to validate that knowledge, become a problem...
It's not really that hard to fix. Not everyone learned English as a first language, and guy has more of a point to make than you do.
MpVpRb t1_jdvrlxj wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Reddit comments tend to be negative and pessimistic about everything. This may often be the case because they are responding to an article, based on an overly optimistic press release. Science and tech press releases tend to use the word "breakthrough" when the work being reported on is actually a small, incremental advance at best. The press releases are intended to raise funds or increase buzz. They get published, almost verbatim, buy the tech press. Skeptical redditors, like me, respond
SoNonGrata t1_jdvpgvh wrote
Reply to comment by Diphda_the_Frog in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
And most don't understand your disaster of a sentence. Did you have a stroke?
"Since when Science, the act of acquiring knowledge trought a step by step process to be able to validated that knowledge became a problem..."
"Some peoples do not understand the concept..."
Not when you write it like that.
[deleted] t1_jdvowaj wrote
[deleted] t1_jdvnpbk wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvn7wv wrote
Reply to comment by dumnezero in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
slickhedstrong t1_jdvn6a2 wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
the amount of cynicism here, where anything can be posted, is a healthy gate and a good inoculation for more casual audience.
science is an abstraction. r/science is a portal into a tiny fragment of that abstraction
and vigilance against accepting all posts to this sub as "truth" is not only healthy, but necessary for this sub's health.
Fellowshipofthebowl t1_jdvmwy2 wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
When politicians use religion as a weapon and marketing tool they are empowering ignorance. No one is surprised.
Diphda_the_Frog t1_jdvm8z1 wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Since when Science, the act of acquiring knowledge trought a step by step process to be able to validated that knowledge became a problem....
Some peoples do not understand the concept...
shogi_x t1_jdvm31w wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
I wonder how Reddit's propensity to comment without actually reading factors into this. I've seen quite a few negative comments that essentially boil down to knee jerk reactions to the headline without actually clicking the link.
[deleted] t1_jdvltof wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvljx9 wrote
Reply to comment by dumnezero in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]
Responsible-Cry266 t1_jdvjsnt wrote
Reply to comment by roodeeMental in CBD Was Efficient In Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain by Defiant_Race_7544
For me it's a muscle relaxant nerve relaxant and also a pain resistor and of course helps with anxiety . Because of this I'm with you and also have to have the complete shebang.
dumnezero t1_jdvjc7d wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Very meta.
>A new study examined comments given on the Reddit forum “r/science” to discover how commenters express negative attitudes towards science. Results showed that these views are most often expressed by describing scientists as corruptible, poor communicators, and misleading. Commenters particularly negatively evaluated social sciences, especially psychology, calling it pseudoscientific. The study was published in the Public Understanding of Science.
...
Batchelor, Jordan. "Just another clickbait title: A corpus-driven investigation of negative attitudes toward science on Reddit." Public Underst. Sci., 12 Jan. 2023, p. 09636625221146453, doi:10.1177/09636625221146453.
>The public understanding of science has produced a large body of research about general attitudes toward science. However, most studies of science attitudes have been carried out via surveys or in experimental conditions, and few make use of the growing contexts of online science communication to investigate attitudes without researcher intervention. This study adopted corpus-based discourse analysis to investigate the negative attitudes held toward science by users of the social media website Reddit, specifically the forum r/science.
>A large corpus of comments made to r/science was collected and mined for keywords. Analysis of keywords identified several sources of negative attitudes, such as claims that scientists can be corruptible, poor communicators, and misleading. Research methodologies were negatively evaluated on the basis of small sample sizes. Other commenters negatively evaluated social science research, especially psychology, as being pseudoscientific, and several commenters described science journalism as untrustworthy or sensationalized.
And the mods should've removed all of those. Press that Nuke button, mods.
[deleted] t1_jdviuot wrote
[deleted] t1_jdviguc wrote
Reply to comment by SuperNovaEmber in Saturated fatty acids dampen the immunogenicity of cancer by suppressing STING (Mar 2023) by basmwklz
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdvib6b wrote
[deleted] t1_jdvi9el wrote
AutoModerator t1_jdvhcu4 wrote
Reply to Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Minute-Object t1_jdvfj2i wrote
Some sad person, somewhere, is using this to imagine a world without women.
[deleted] t1_jdvd474 wrote
[removed]
TheGreat_War_Machine t1_jdvd170 wrote
Reply to comment by kwpang in The Mice with Two Dads: Scientists Create Eggs from Male Cells by wmdolls
Probably the same or similar way that we can predetermine the sex of a baby.
Edit: Although, it would be interesting to study the effects of that karotype, because it is impossible to achieve under natural circumstances, so we don't really know much about it.
[deleted] t1_jdvu3id wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science by HeinieKaboobler
[removed]