Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

turnipham t1_jeg939c wrote

Don't pay off the student loans in advance. I had a similar amount and I paid it off over 20+ years at somewhere between $100-$150 dollars a month. It really is not going to impact you that much, especially decades later when you're earning way more.

I imagine it this way. Imagine if someone assembled 20k from your earnings over 20 years. That's quite an assembly of capital and a decent interest rate. You might as well do something with it you can't otherwise do because you're never going to get a 20k loan with 4% interest ever again (credit cards? LOL) except maybe a new auto loan or a mortgage.

1

DMball OP t1_jeg8zqe wrote

My apologies, although not sure why it matters.

​

I'd prefer to keep it in cash as I contribute and build up to the max and then rollover all at once. This prevents me from losing money in investments (and having to sell to rollover) if the market goes down. Essentially this is short term savings so ideally i'd love to reap the high yield of the money market fund before rollover and investing in ETFs for long term savings.

1

Unknown_Redundancy t1_jeg8x4x wrote

If you do stagehand work, I'd look into exhibit design for sure. A lot of companies do work for the big trade shows and conferences if you're near the area where those happen. They basically build sets in the exhibit hall and need the same kind of building and managing folks.

The applying is really the most soul crushing kind of grind, may you have good luck and endurance going through those job apps.

2

ivydesert t1_jeg84fi wrote

We don't exactly split things down the middle. I pay for some bills, she pays for others, and it all comes out to roughly the same, give or take.

We have a joint savings account for travel, home improvement, and other things we're saving up for. I've added her to one of my credit cards and I'm one one of hers. As far as shared finances go, that's it.

2

totallyjaded t1_jeg7j5y wrote

Well...

I was going to ask, too. Because it isn't unusual for an at-fault driver's insurance company to offer you $500 here.

While Michigan is a no-fault state, if one party was clearly more than 50% at fault (usually indicated by having received a ticket for a moving violation associated with the accident) the other party can sue in small claims court under mini-tort for up to $1,000.

I've had three accidents where the other driver's insurance cut me a check for my deductible just by calling them and politely asking to save everyone the time of going to court. In each incident, their customer had either been ticketed, or was obviously at fault (by hitting my parked car while I was standing next to it).

3

ivydesert t1_jeg7fcs wrote

How will marriage help in this situation? I don't see any complications that OP is facing that marriage would preclude.

My wife and I bought our house two years before we married and split the tax stuff equally.

3

sin-eater82 t1_jeg7a08 wrote

Hmm, I mean, I would never lean that way. I can't realistically have negative income next year. That's just not a thing. You can have losses if you look at it that way. I don't think that's really the spirit of the question at all.

As for what you found about businesses, I mean, you're not a business. It's a vastly different context.

It's a weird one. That said, there must be "an answer" somewhere. You're not the only person living off of investments afterall.

1

Bangkok_Dangeresque t1_jeg77fu wrote

Well since you know you have a pregnancy/birth coming up next year, if you do choose the PPO you should certainly contribute something. You know you will have out of pocket medical expenses. May as well get an effective 22% (+whatever your state tax rate is) discount on them.

That said, the math here makes it so that in virtually all scenarios you come out ahead with the HDHP, so long as you do actually max out the HSA.

If you have $0 in healthcare expenses, the PPO will cost you an effective -$3401, while you will actually be +$1510 better off on the HDHP. As in, with the employer HSA contribution plus your tax savings from contributing, you will make money on the HDHP as a starting point.

In the maximal care scenario where you hit the (shockingly similar) out of pocket max for both plans, the PPO effective cost will be -$6,851, while the HDHP effective cost will be -$5,290. So in the worst case scenario you'd be $1,561 better off on the HDHP.

Things can get a little hazier in the middle though. In theory, if most of the care you need is in the form of visits that require a copay rather than cost sharing, it's possible that there's a zone of moderate healthcare usage where the PPO makes you better off. At least in terms of direct out of pocket expenses.

For example, say you have 10x visits to specialists. On the HDHP this might be $2,000 out of pocket towards your deductible (assuming $200 billed per visit), but on the PPO it might only be $350 out of pocket in copays (assuming a $35 copay per visit).

Though even then, while the that extra $1650 out of pocket for the same care might sting your checking account, your overall effective cost accounting for the employer HSA contributions plus your tax savings on the HDHP would be $1561 - $2000 = -$490, while the PPO would be -$3401 - $350 = -$3751.

So still much better off on net. The difference would be even starker if instead of office visits you had coinsurance-eligible care on the PPO, since the 20% rate is the same.

On the other hand contributing to an FSA with the PPO would moderate the differences somewhat.

1