Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

SillyBunnySecrets t1_jefgfc3 wrote

Don't take their offer. I've been rear ended and ended up with my car being totaled by a teenager who had already gotten into three accidents. I was basically called constantly by the at-fault driver's insurance asking me to take "free money". I contacted my insurance company (USAA) and they explained the other insurance company was trying to get out of paying a bigger dollar amount because my insurance company went after the driver to pay for everything. If I had accepted, I would be on the hook for all the medical, repair, etc.

2

Grevious47 t1_jeffzi4 wrote

Hope I didnt scare you off. Its a lovely city but yeah I would expect it would be tight on 65k a year for two. If you rent a 1 bedroom then maybe talking more like $1600/mo. Food for two its probably possible to do on $500/mo. Gas is about $4.50 a gallon out here. I mean Im sure you can manage but yes it is expensive to live in Seattle and your lifestyle and comfort moving here from Texas would almost certainly take a hit.

2

blacklassie t1_jeffo2l wrote

As an investment, real estate is entirely dependent on local conditions. If your area is booming, how sustainable is that growth? Is it tied to a specific industry? Also, do you want to stay in this community for the long term?

1

Exioras t1_jeffkd7 wrote

You are pretty much set up for an ideal start to life as far as this sub is concerned. There is not much more than the basic guide for kicking off ROTH/401k that you'd need. Don't go crazy in trying to pick stocks. Follow the basics we practice here. Read the sidebar. You're in a very very nice spot. Good job and good luck at the new job.

3

PetraLoseIt t1_jeffimk wrote

You might get to $3 million. You have about $460k now. If you keep adding $24k per year, I come to $2.8 million twenty years from now, assuming a 7% return.

What would help is:

  • socking away more money, starting as soon as you can. The longer that money can grow, the more it will become. Saving an extra $10k now is better than saving $10k when you're 60.
  • reducing your expenses now and also when you're retired
  • pay off debt and reduce your ongoing liabilities/bills. If you plan to continue to live in your current house, this could include making the house more energy efficient and buying/building things that last forever instead of just ten years (so good quality furniture and appliances and things like that).

By the way, I'd take social security into account for say half of the currently promised amount. If that gives say $40k/year after age 67, that means that by that age it represents about 25 x $40k = $1 million of net worth that you don't need to save up.

1

penguinise t1_jeffhsn wrote

Treasuries usually have better rates and are exempt from state income tax, but other than the effective return you can consider them to be the same thing as CDs, so select the one with the better return.

You buy Treasury Bills at a discount to their $100 face value, and they get redeemed by the Treasury for $100 on the maturity date. If you buy them at a brokerage, you can sell them early for market price, which may or may not be attractive. In that way they are similar to CDs - you get a guaranteed return if you hold them to maturity and can cash out early for a potential small penalty.

"Laddering" as a concept applies equally to Treasuries or CDs - the idea is to have a "ladder" of them which mature at regular intervals, meaning that you more frequently have access to cash via a maturity event, so you can access the cash without having to sell a Treasury or break a CD.

30

RussRevengeTour23-24 t1_jeffbko wrote

Not positive on that, but I don’t think there are any taxes. You always hear of the “triple tax advantages” of the HSA. It’s the best thing going.

Edit: confirmed that there shouldn’t be any taxes on growth.

https://www.morganstanley.com/articles/health-savings-account-retirement-tax-advantages#:~:text=HSAs%20are%20savings%20vehicles%20that,enjoy%20tax%2Dfree%20growth%20potential.

2