Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

tomvorlostriddle t1_jeehjv7 wrote

You are confused because you didn't decide what your plans and lifestyle will be for the long term.

Decide this and the financial questions will answer themselves.

But you could also find out that you have incompatible visions, finances have this nasty habit of not allowing you to remain in denial about such possible incompatibilities.

2

[deleted] OP t1_jeeh797 wrote

But the two of us can’t decide the fairest way! B is happy to pay 50/50 taking everything out of the equation, but A thinks perhaps that’s not the fairest way to do it given some of the elements involved (higher salary, mortgage not joint) … so we’re looking for a wider opinion to help decide best way forward!

1

Rave-Unicorn-Votive t1_jeeh4iy wrote

>no deductions

>I'm not withholding anything

You seem to be confused on terminology. If you're not withholding anything, ie you have $0 deductions for taxes on your paychecks, then of course you'll owe at the end of the year.

If you are confusing 'withholdings' with the outdated and no longer in existence 'allowances' and think that "claiming 0" means maximum withholding…it does not. Maximum withholding would be 100% of your paycheck.

Assuming you are neither withholding $0 nor 100%, if your tax bracket is ≥24% and your commissions are withheld at the supplemental rate of 22%, you will always be under withheld on the year unless you adjust your W4 to compensate by over withholding your regular paychecks.

20

megarooski3 t1_jeeh2z5 wrote

My total base salary is $152k, and my total commission (what I make if I hit 100% if my plan) is an additional $101k. I am paid bi-monthly, 1st pay check is salary only, 2nd paycheck is salary+commission for the pay period.

I am claiming nothing on my W4s, so withholding nothing.

−2

lilfunky1 t1_jeegv88 wrote

find a similar house that's for rent, and partner B should pay approximately half what the rental cost is as their housing expense. they are a tenant, and should pay what a tenant pays.

other ongoing bills (utilities, cable/internet/TV tax... that's a thing in the UK IIRC?) should be split 50/50, or based on income, whatever they believe is fair for their relationship.

1

gooberfaced t1_jeegr47 wrote

What we think is irrelevant.

What the two of you decide when you sit down and talk about it is what matters.

IMO partner B pays a rent amount that both feel is fair to cover both any rent and a portion of utilities that are included.

1

[deleted] OP t1_jeegmks wrote

But what if for example B is currently earning less because a new job was just taken and A encouraged them to take it? That’s why we’ve also considered the income based approach - so both are fairly impacted by the change in salary and not just B

−2