Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
The_Lapsed_Pacifist t1_jbzo52y wrote
Reply to comment by AlternativeFormer559 in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
Thanks mate, luv me Johnny Pie, simple as.
IAmTheClayman t1_jbzm5zu wrote
Just a reminder that getting “cancelled” isn’t a thing, but the will of the public very much is. The BBC and supporters of the anti-asylum bill have publicly demonstrated that they are in the minority, and attempting to punish Lineker has backfired on the BBC in a major way.
Difficult position for them to be in given the way their funding works, but the smart thing to do would have been not to take any action before seeing which way the wind was blowing
Errorboros OP t1_jbzj4ey wrote
Reply to comment by Tephain in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
Was that word-salad, or did I have a stroke?
PinealFever t1_jbzi58j wrote
For telling the truth!
Sheesh!
Fordmister t1_jbzi2uk wrote
Reply to comment by mzivtins in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
Mate the board of British Jews and the Auschwitz museum beat him to that comparison by over a month.... or are is the UK's biggest Jewish organisation and major holocaust memorial groups trivializing the holocaust now?
Supermichael777 t1_jbzdzw0 wrote
Reply to comment by pickyourpants in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
We have a winner.
Tephain t1_jbzdwns wrote
That’s not the reason he is being chased and fired. Stop trying to do the diry job to justify that a man can’t be entitled to make an opinion on his government policies, or otherwise will happen what’s is actually happening.
Tejanah t1_jbzdcv3 wrote
Seems pretty clear to me - the Director General and the BBC Chairman must resign
soldforaspaceship t1_jbzc4yf wrote
Reply to comment by mzivtins in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
You know what the victims of the Holocaust might have liked? Someone calling out dehumanizing language before the Holocaust happened. They would have liked it to never get that far. They wouldn't have liked people pretending everything is OK.
Do you know how I know this? Because an actual Holocaust survivor called out the exact same thing.
soldforaspaceship t1_jbzbp4i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
Do you think laughing at your own jokes makes you sound smarter? It doesn't.
The point they are making is that the BBC had no issue when Linekar criticized Qatar. Or when he criticized Corbyn. So it is exposing a bias at the BBC.
Conservatives is a term given to mean supporters of the Conservative party.
You seemed very confused so I hope that cleared it all up for you.
tauntingbob t1_jbzb6yp wrote
Reply to comment by MidnightCh1cken in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
> Good heavens, this is beyond awful.
In the context of Braverman's horrific video about being invaded by hordes.
Followed by:
> There is no huge influx. We take far fewer refugees than other major European countries. This is just an immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s, and I’m out of order?
pickyourpants t1_jbzaaza wrote
Their definition of impartial makes no sense. Legislation is passed by whichever party or coalition is in power. Criticizing a piece of legislation will, therefore, always be a criticism of whoever was in power when it was passed. To remain impartial, according to the BBC’s definition means never criticizing legislation. Which means the BBC cannot hold politicians accountable for poor decisions.
Impartial means looking at the impact of the legislation rather than commenting on who wrote it. As far as I can see, that’s what Lineker did in his tweet.
Borisof007 t1_jbz9s8j wrote
What and Gary? OH British Broadcasting...right
sprint6864 t1_jbz9om5 wrote
Reply to comment by MammothEmergency8581 in Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
He's addressing it so others recognize it.
MammothEmergency8581 t1_jbz99ya wrote
Reply to comment by sprint6864 in Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
He should have addressed it privately. Not publicly. You don't seem to get that part, do you? Which part of it is hard for you to get? Privacy? Respect? His lack of gratefulness? Okay, bud.
sprint6864 t1_jbz898n wrote
Reply to comment by MammothEmergency8581 in Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
Bud, it's racist. Read the damn article, he doesn't condemn it
MammothEmergency8581 t1_jbz6rtd wrote
Reply to Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
What happened with addressing private family grievances in privacy of your own home. He chose to drag his parents through mud for lack of knowledge, instead of being thankful publicly for all good they did for him. No good deed goes unpunished.
MammothEmergency8581 t1_jbz6ax2 wrote
Reply to comment by sprint6864 in Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
Lack of proper knowledge in how to raise a child of different culture is not something to condem. If he was a grown up man, and not a spoiled brat, he would have addressed this in privacy of their own family. Instead he chose to shame them publicly. After all they have giving him they are painted as monsters. He should be ashamed of himself. He is not a respectable man or a respectful son. Just a spoiled brat in an adult body.
MammothEmergency8581 t1_jbz59j4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
Bare minimum? Without them he wouldn't be spoiled brat that he became. Without them he most likely wouldn't be playing football. They did the raising, and teaching, and paying emotionally and financially. Which is not just more than what his mother did, it's more than what most parent do for their own children.
dontberidiculousfool t1_jbz56c7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
Find us a conservative who doesn’t hate asylum seekers.
[deleted] t1_jbz4bmb wrote
Reply to comment by MammothEmergency8581 in Colin Kaepernick says adoptive white parents perpetuated 'racism' at times while raising him by DrChefAstronaut
Big claps to his parents for doing 👏 the 👏 bare 👏 minimum 👏
MidnightCh1cken t1_jbyw86c wrote
What exactly did he say in his Tweet that was so controversial?
[deleted] t1_jbyoc0k wrote
Reply to comment by alexanderpas in BBC and Gary Lineker: Tweets decision comes at high price for BBC by Errorboros
[deleted]
Vesalii t1_jbymn6e wrote
Reply to comment by Duracted in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Oh right, I must have misunderstood. Tha ks for clearing thst up.
[deleted] t1_jbzodnr wrote
Reply to A Connecticut school lunch lady is charged with giving students obscene films and nude images. by Mccar23
[removed]