Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
DangerStranger138 t1_jbup5ku wrote
Ich bin Berlin
dew22 t1_jbumtvy wrote
Reply to comment by vpi6 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
It’s a 60 year old building that’s a great example of googie architecture which has been disappearing for decades. Again just because you fail to see historical significance of a building doesn’t mean there is not any historical or architectural significance
TjW0569 t1_jbujziy wrote
I'm sure they'll be charged, now.
PeterDTown t1_jbujw74 wrote
Reply to comment by marrangutang in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Any chance you’re in Toronto? It’s like a bad running joke at this point.
1337duck t1_jbujorn wrote
Reply to comment by danielv123 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
That's what multiple real estate agents told me.
It's possible they are all lying.
According to google search of "does stairs count to sqft"
> Stairs: Runs/treads and landings both count in square footage totals. They are measured as a part of the floor “from which they descend,” so are generally counted twice in a typical two-story home with a basement.
windyorbits t1_jbujn92 wrote
Reply to comment by Kaiserhawk in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
I do agree that these building are a giant pain in the butt but I don’t agree with anything else you said.
Now I’m in the USA, so obviously way different circumstances. But many of the older/protected/historically buildings here fall into this weird catch-22. You can purchase these buildings BUT there are so many rules about what you can and can’t not do is so extensive it becomes nearly impossible to renovate/remodel.
For example, not too far from me is this beautiful historical “mansion” that’s been up for sale for 30 years almost. Buyers come to check it out but once they find out what they can’t do they don’t think it’s worth it. I was able to go inside one time and the 1st and 2nd floor combined have about 15 of these teeny tiny little rooms. Which was normal 100+ years ago but not now. There just enough room for a small bed and that’s it.
Pretty much every buyer is like “no problem, we’ll just knock a few walls down to make bigger rooms” but they cant because it’s historically protected. No insulation, no ac/heating, no washer/dryer hookups and none of that can be added. So it just sits there, decade after decade, falling apart.
MetricVeil t1_jbujfy2 wrote
Reply to comment by AtLeastThisIsntImgur in European court at odds with British values, says Suella Braverman by Mighty_L_LORT
Serendipity rules! :D
[deleted] t1_jbuifq3 wrote
Reply to comment by psilocin72 in Person arrested for DUI twice in five hours in York County, PA by ChristmasWizzard
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbuie1v wrote
[removed]
danielv123 t1_jbuichc wrote
Reply to comment by 1337duck in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Wait what? That makes no sense! If anything, they shouldn't count for either floor!
[deleted] t1_jbuial2 wrote
[removed]
Cayfish t1_jbui6w4 wrote
Reply to comment by lyfe_is_a_nyghtmare in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Apartment buildings are necessary, they are especially useful in the housing crisis. However, if you're going to demolish a historic building for it, make sure the old building is in disrepair and consider whether its historic value if enough to warrant keeping it.
MeanGreanHare t1_jbugqbw wrote
There was a story in the US a while back about someone who bought a historic house. The house was infested with termites and rot. They calculated the costs and found that it would be considerably more expensive to restore it, than to demolish it and build an identical house. The city council wouldn't have it so they're stuck with it unless a mysterious fire happens.
starm4nn t1_jbug4co wrote
Reply to comment by uxbridge3000 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Explain why they bought the pub if it was covered under this law.
Or do you think bad businesses should be rewarded?
jimicus t1_jbudhv2 wrote
Reply to comment by aLittleQueer in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
The really aggravating thing is, we've lived in a house where a room doubled up as a corridor before. We knew damn well it didn't work.
But there aren't a great many houses in this town and they're almost all built to one of a couple of designs, all of which have this problem.
MyDudeNak t1_jbud55i wrote
Reply to comment by nydwarf in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
> stands in contrast to a 2015 city evaluation that deemed it wasn't a "historical resource."
Honestly a dude buying a house and then getting fucked over by flip flopping bureaucrats doesn't feel as good as property developers trying to skirt around the law and getting their just desserts.
Light-Delablue t1_jbu9uh0 wrote
Reply to comment by vpi6 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
skill issue for put shity parking lots as historical
Taffuardo t1_jbu9ncb wrote
Reply to comment by Hotbacchus123 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
It really is! Great live music there as well ☺️
[deleted] t1_jbu9kas wrote
Reply to comment by vpi6 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jbu96dt wrote
Reply to comment by Kaiserhawk in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
[removed]
firebat45 t1_jbu7ow9 wrote
Reply to comment by 1337duck in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Skinny homes are just mobile homes cut in half and stacked. With the added benefit of losing floorspace to stairs.
nonegotiation t1_jbu6uqn wrote
Reply to comment by marrangutang in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
The article says the pub wad set on fire a few times....
JiminyDickish t1_jbu6fsl wrote
Reply to comment by NerdHunt in City of Toronto puts up sign limiting barking at dog park, removes it following public scrutiny by nimobo
>Then there would have been something you had to sign
Nope. Not how it works. City council holds public hearings and then decides. You can voice your opinion at the meeting but if they still go forward with it then there’s nothing you can do.
NerdHunt t1_jbu5gpl wrote
Reply to comment by JiminyDickish in City of Toronto puts up sign limiting barking at dog park, removes it following public scrutiny by nimobo
Then there would have been something you had to sign for the installment of such thing, and if there isn’t and the park is now driving the value of your property down due to the new disturbance, you have a lawsuit in your hands.
Realistically what happens is someone moves next to a school or a dog park and never try to go down there to the house in the rush-hour see what it will be like living there, and when they do get down there after they bought the house they become sorely dissapointed.
danielv123 t1_jbupnm6 wrote
Reply to comment by 1337duck in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
What a scam.