Recent comments in /f/movies
Ill_Contribution9075 t1_je3po9w wrote
Reply to Anybody else think John Wick 4 sucked by Ruass160
Troll or GME/ Crypto guy, can’t tell which
Tomosc t1_je3pi89 wrote
Reply to Anybody else think John Wick 4 sucked by Ruass160
Over the top fights are kind of the point.
_KrustytheClown_ t1_je3pc67 wrote
Reply to Anybody else think John Wick 4 sucked by Ruass160
This has got to be a shitpost
[deleted] t1_je3p62d wrote
Reply to Anybody else think John Wick 4 sucked by Ruass160
[deleted]
One-Panic-8102 t1_je3oulb wrote
Pride and Prejudice (Keira Knightly Movie)- Pros: adapts the meandering book structure into a powerful and affective 3-act-movie structure which managed to connect with modern audiences, no easy feat!
Cons: has the feeling of a shlocky modern romance novel rather than the subtlety and humor of the original. WHY IS DARCY SO BORING AND MEAN? WHY IS ELIZABETH SO BORING? AUGHHHHHH
Pride and Prejudice (90s series): Pros: A more faithful adaptation technically and I’m fully rooting for this Elizabeth, who captures the wit and charm of the original.
Cons: again…why do you all make Darcy so darn boring?!?! There are places in the book where he reacts with clear emotion where these adaptations will have the actor just sit there like a space cadet. He is RESERVED not fully CHECKED OUT. PLEASE.
Emma (2020?): haven’t finished the book honestly but… Cons: just a little too much modern-feeling humor. A little cartoony at points.
Pros: the best adaptation of the tone, structure and subtlety of an Austen novel I’ve seen! The focus on the interpersonal relationships and the ways they evolve and interact with issues of marriage, class, wealth, plus all the annoying (funny) quotidian issues of fussy family and such- so good. Such a great adaptation of austen’s subjects and style.
Anne of Green Gables on Netflix: nooooooooooo
Bridge to Terabithia (90s): haven’t seen it in a while (I was a kid) but I remember being very disappointed. Very 90’s corny where the film could have been as beautiful, artistic and melancholy as the book. From what i remember they also completely gloss over the wealth and gender topics of the main characters in favor of Relatable 90’s Boy and Manic Pixie Dream Girl. Blegh. Wish they remade this one with a good director sometime.
Tuck Everlasting: damn good, maybe even almost better than the book? I liked how they aged Winnie to be older and added a little more of her romance, it made it feel like a more impactful growing-up story. Every actor breathes life into their roles, and Angus especially kills it.
ArtfulMegalodon t1_je3ou5s wrote
Reply to Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
"...I can do anything!"
"Oh yeah? CLAP."
The whole movie is an embarrassing mess, but man, I love that line.
DrewXO- t1_je3ors0 wrote
Reply to Anybody else think John Wick 4 sucked by Ruass160
Did you watch John wick 3? Lmao
AStandardTemperature t1_je3orqp wrote
A biopic doesn’t have to be cliche. You can tell a story about a real person that is structured in a unique, unexpected way. My expectation is that the movie do something unexpected.
[deleted] t1_je3ol8s wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
[deleted]
Panta125 t1_je3ogte wrote
Reply to Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
Dude that move is dope
NoirYorkCity t1_je3oe8v wrote
Reply to comment by Friendly_Childhood in Leonardo DiCaprio has only worked with 3 directors more than once: Baz Luhrmann (2x), Quentin Tarantino (2x), Martin Scorsese (6x). by jankyeyes
What's Digesting Gilbert Grape?
luanaut t1_je3obf1 wrote
Misery
Pros: Kathy Bates
Cons: Left out basically everything that made the book great
tigojones t1_je3o0z5 wrote
Reply to comment by TimeTravelMishap in Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
A little ironic, given his involvement in basically doing the same to Zack Snyder.
amplifylight t1_je3nzlh wrote
Reply to Hypothetically… If you were to create a film studio that rivals Disney/Paramount/WB etc. how would you do it? by AMAROK300
You would find someone with the filmmaker prominence of Spielberg, the industry prominence of Katzenberg and Geffen and raise billions from banks. So team up Nolan with Bob Iger and say Charles King.
Even then you’ll probably just be successful enough to sell it off to a bigger studio, as happened with Dreamworks SKG.
The other thing to keep in mind is TV is as or more important than film these days.
A24 is the wrong comparison because it’s a speciality brand. Even when they make poppy movies it’s still aimed with a certain type of film audience in mind.
Igai t1_je3nz13 wrote
Reply to comment by TraverseTown in What are iconic films everyone knows in your country ? by LanaStudio
oh, i realaised that i misread the entire title :X
i thoughts its "a movie your country is known for".
​
It's probably "Muttertag" "Indien" "Das finstere Tal" then. And its NOT the sound of music xD
tigojones t1_je3nmjd wrote
Reply to Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
Yes, yes it is. This is studio interference in a nutshell, plus some inexperience. Luckily, the TV show was significantly better, because he was able to maintain more control over it and make it (mostly) HIS show.
It's just too bad that he ended up a major jackass (was he always like this, but it was kept under wraps, or did his personality "evolve" into this over time. Does it even really matter?). His works make up a significant portion of my favourite shows and movies, and I will pretty much check out any show/film featuring any of the major cast members of Buffy/Angel/Firefly, just because of how much I enjoyed those shows.
Select-Classroom-121 t1_je3nlkv wrote
Pretty much the answer is always Dolby. You get atmos sound. If it’s shot IMAX then maybe Imax but also maters if it’s IMAX laser or xenon.
Personally I always just go Dolby if I wasn’t the best
shaka_sulu t1_je3njbj wrote
Reply to "City on Fire" and Reservoir Dogs" by OneADayMens
My favorite short film on the subject - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HgbSAL8OKY
King_Buliwyf t1_je3nikq wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
As someone who is: an adult, and a serious fan of the series; the movie is still great fun. OP is being a stick in the mud.
OneADayMens OP t1_je3nc8p wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_Monty_Burns in "City on Fire" and Reservoir Dogs" by OneADayMens
I mean it seems like he's agreeing with my post, that there's some similarity to the very endings but otherwise they're totally different movies that play out very differently.
[deleted] t1_je3nagh wrote
Reply to comment by zak55 in Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
[deleted]
BrockHard253 t1_je3n640 wrote
Reply to comment by zak55 in Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
I think he was just trying to forget about his little romp at the movie theater.
Sks44 t1_je3n4gg wrote
Reply to Leon: The Professional (1994) Discussion by HS_13_
I remember thinking the Leon/Mathilda relationship was odd. Then I saw an extended cut and it was flat out pedo creepy. Besson is a creepy groomer. It kind of ruined the movie for me. I can’t even watch the American edit.
mr_Papini t1_je3n32b wrote
Reply to comment by zak55 in Buffy The Vampire Slayer 1992 is freaking weird by zak55
And that vampire is none other than Pee-wee Herman
zeldafan144 t1_je3pp7y wrote
Reply to Anybody else think John Wick 4 sucked by Ruass160
Judging John Wick on its story and dialogue is the same as saying there aren't enough action scenes in Pulp Fiction so its boring.