Recent comments in /f/movies

virgopunk t1_je0wb5s wrote

Much as I am amazed with the action in the JW franchise, it's pretty weak sauce. I agree with the OP, the first is the best and they get progressively more baroque. The 'lore', such as it is, is just something to pass the time between the action scenes. Having said all that I watched 3 last night and mostly enjoyed it. I do wish they'd have kept it more grounded in the real world tho.

0

RemoteDiscount7439 t1_je0vvyz wrote

Agreed, but it's uncanny how similar the two movies are.

Leo hallucinates about his wife and children in both, both movies have major and important sequences in heavy rainfall and snow, and at the end, in both movies it is revealed that >! Leo's characters actions was what had led to the death of their wives- planting an idea or murder out of rage !<

11

arealhumannotabot t1_je0vv5f wrote

I don't think Spielberg does a lot of movies that Leo would act in. Not about quality, but the choices he makes. Leo seems to have really gotten into genre movies more and more.

Other than Titanic does he do much standard comedy/drama? I don't think so...?

12

WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_je0vr5e wrote

You are not alone. I support this wholeheartedly and usually get downvoted for it, but my biggest complaint has been bloat.

JW3 was too long by far. I've used this example before, but my wife fell asleep in the last third of the film, because it just dragged out too much.

JW4 is also too long, but it combats the repetitiveness by changing up the protagonists in fights. Jumping from John to Akira to Caine to the Tracker and so on broke up the lags... for the most part (the nunchuck fight and the staircase fight still went on too long by half).

1

Edlover203 OP t1_je0trub wrote

I’m talking grounded in comparison to the other 3 I was never implying that the action in JW is anywhere near realistic. Also the first one does not have any super insane reality bending action. Obviously fights in real life do not look like a John Wick fight.

1

TheCosmicFailure t1_je0t6v4 wrote

I disagree. While the first one is brisk. I love the subsequent sequels building of lore. The action scenes are more impressive. The Cinematography is definitely better. Most of the supporting characters are more interesting. Same thing With the villains.

My ranking is

  1. John Wick Part 2

  2. John Wick Part 4

  3. John Wick Part 3

  4. John Wick Part 1

1

mickeyflinn t1_je0t4ux wrote

I hope The Duffers don't bother with a Star Wars product.

The next thing they have coming up is an adaptation of a Stephen King Novel and a Stranger Things Spin-Off.

I think there were also working on a live adaptation of an Anime as well.

1

bravetailor t1_je0t3tq wrote

2 is the best, I haven't seen 4 yet.

John Wick always was a comic book concept. The first one tried to play it straight, and was more art-house-y, but I felt like the suit hadn't quite fit yet. 2 turned the franchise more to its pulpy influences--fun but it wasn't completely ridiculous yet. 3 is when it really started to go ham on the lore and backstory, which is great for fanboys who love that stuff, but imo it made a simple, streamlined action franchise more closer to the average mainstream blockbuster.

Also, Halle Berry was just awful in 3

−2

Fre3Monk t1_je0sejm wrote

My opinion is that John Wick 2 is the best out of the four.

I enjoyed John Wick 4, but I left the theatre yesterday feeling a little underwhelmed with the end of the story.

The action set pieces in JW4 are amazing and set the standard for every action movie that comes out gong forward.

The story though in JW4 just didn’t hit, and the conclusion for John Wick and High Table felt kinda short changed. It final outcome didn’t bother me either….I just can’t put my finger on it exactly why I wasn’t sold on the ending.

Either way fantastic set of movies throughout that stepped it up each and every time.

0