Recent comments in /f/gifs

txlessor t1_jccqt4n wrote

Reply to comment by ChizzleFug in He will follow his best friend anywhere by lnfinity

Mine, RIP, came defective. Hawk attacking the hens? I'll run away without a sound. Me, who brings food, water, and treats. He would make the warning sound every time and try to attack every 6 months... He would charge me then get punted across the yard and behave for another 6 months.

7

Academic_Gazelle_340 t1_jcclr4h wrote

Reply to comment by Ichthyologist in He will follow his best friend anywhere by lnfinity

> You don't think grazing animals in the wild aren't pregnant every year

How does this justify forcefully inseminating them (aka raping them) as a human?

> You have no room for gray in your black and white world.

Correct. I will not compromise when it comes to needlessly violently exploiting and abusing innocent animals for pleasure. There is no room for that form of 'grey' in my world.

Abusing and exploiting animals for pleasure is not necessary. This is a simple fact that also does not concern itself with making room for "gray".

> This is why you get kickback from society.

Nope. It's because these simple facts challenge consumer behaviors and pleasures that people's egos are attached to.

Exposure to this information over time will weaken the ego so these people can accept these simple facts and this trend is already observable on this platform. There is far less "kickback" from society the more educated society becomes on this topic and the information is spreadsing. The same exact dynamic also played out for the public's perception of cannabis. The masses were propagandized against it for ages and also "kickbacked" in the face of simple facts on the topic. Facts are facts, however. The ego can only try to block out facts for so long before eventually realizing the fact wasn't ever the problem, but the ego's attachment to the topic at hand.

−5

ammonium_bot t1_jcckn42 wrote

Reply to comment by GrandmasBoyToy69 in He will follow his best friend anywhere by lnfinity

> i would of had

Did you mean to say "would have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 3839
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^Github

13

Academic_Gazelle_340 t1_jcck3zv wrote

Reply to comment by Raul_Coronado in He will follow his best friend anywhere by lnfinity

> its not surprising if your version doesn’t have a sense of authenticity.

Right, because exploitation and abuse aren't inherently part of the dairy industry.

No wait, those industries would not exist if not for the exploitation and abuse.

It should not be surprising that animals would become defensive over their children in such industries.

−2

Raul_Coronado t1_jccjia5 wrote

Reply to comment by EcoEchos in He will follow his best friend anywhere by lnfinity

Morality is relative, if the storyteller says someone or something is an asshole thats it. You can tell your own story, which you did, but since you don’t have any access to the primary source its not surprising if your version doesn’t have a sense of authenticity.

7