Recent comments in /f/gadgets

disappointedvet t1_jb9crub wrote

Ridiculous article. The streaming boxes we have offer incredible content at a ridiculously low cost. No, they don't do everything the writer complains about wanting, but there's no good reason to make a box with all those capabilities. There's no money to be made as the large majority of consumers don't need, don't want, and wouldn't pay for it.

2

acf6b t1_jb99pvc wrote

Stupid waste of an article. There were companies that tried to come out with high end machines, apple has their mini Mac, Valve and Nvidia have their boxes, if they sold well the actual streaming companies would have followed suit. I have the Roku Stream Bar, which is a sound bar with the Roku in it, no one buys it….. consumers just want cheap streaming boxes, so of course the companies will only make those.

2

fishywiki t1_jb94f1h wrote

I use one in an old TV in the bedroom and have just gotten another for another aging not-so-smart TV. They are better than the streaming boxes, but they all (boxes and Chromecast) suffer from the dreadfully poor performance - I don't know what processors they use but for a few cents more they could just as easily have something that is reasonably nippy.

1

SpecialNose9325 t1_jb8r5u6 wrote

The lack of reason to upgrade is actually astounding. I have a second gen Chromecast cuz I have a really old TV. Most new TVs come with some smart stuff built in. If you really want a remote, a Google TV is $50. I dont see the appeal for these $250 streaming boxes that do nothing more than a Chromecast.

3