Recent comments in /f/boston
jazzdrums1979 OP t1_jddanld wrote
Just to give you more context, this is the driver, when I passed him I checked there we’re no passengers in the vehicle. I’m in the left lane driving at Rt 24 speeds this guy has to be going at least 65.
Anthropomorphotic t1_jddajyi wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
The Atlantic featured an article not too long ago about today's cars and their headlight problem.
IIRC, it's a combination of:
-
Brighter, whiter/bluer color tones
-
The height of cars/trucks has increased in recent years.
-
A large percentage of new cars come with at least one of the sides out of adjustment.
This creates a horrible glare experience for oncoming traffic.
I have a 2022 Highlander. I get people flashing their high beams at me constantly...and I've confirmed the lights are adjusted properly. It's a drag.
Jusmon1108 t1_jddagnb wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Not true inside 128. Belmont, Lexington and Winchester all have some dark winding roads that are safer to travel with high beams. Inside 495 you’re completely wrong.
[deleted] OP t1_jdd8brj wrote
Reply to comment by lisa_williams_wgbh in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
[deleted]
NEU_Throwaway1 t1_jdd7ikt wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
The biggest offenders I see are usually cars with Uber or Lyft stickers in the windshield. I asked my driver once why he was driving through Boston city streets with his high beams on and his reply was "It's brighter."
ParkUpper52 t1_jdd5j1h wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Somebody has never been to Dover before.
[deleted] OP t1_jdd4u1e wrote
Reply to comment by 2nd-Hand-Butt-Plug in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
[removed]
closerocks t1_jdd4tul wrote
Reply to comment by BsFan in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Yeah I was going to point out that the OP was probably a city person. There are lots of dark roads inside of 495 especially at 2 AM.
For the longest time, I never used high beams except in very low traffic situations because I forget that thereon. That faint blue indicator isn't really helpful. My current car has auto high beams which so far has never failed to shut off when there's a hint of a car in front of me.
If I have this feature in a 2017 Chevy, most modern cars probably have as well but I bet the operators of said vehicles don't know how to use these features.
[deleted] OP t1_jdd4lae wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
[removed]
Nebuli2 t1_jdd4e7u wrote
Reply to comment by BsFan in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
So many drivers around here also don't seem to realize that having your high beams on while behind another car is also bad. Do they not get that the high beams are reflected in the other driver's mirrors?
walterbernardjr t1_jdd42va wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
High beams are pretty useful in the dark and curvy roads off Rt 2 in Sudbury / concord
murdersimulator t1_jdd31if wrote
Reply to Interesting Globe article about how DCF avoids going through the courts when they take custody of children by dazzlingupstairz
I feel like there has to be something seriously wrong for DCF to take the kids. I was a huge piece of shit for many years and had DCF called to my house. I was open, honest and cooperated with my caseworker. Seems like as long as you are willing and can prove you're taking steps to solve the problem DCF will actually help you.
meheeya t1_jdd315x wrote
Reply to comment by pmv8899 in Who's winning the sportsbook war in MA thus far? by oyeme
If you haven’t already, contact support and let them know. Same situation for me and after chatting with them, they confirmed their mistake and are going to load it manually to my account
Present-Evidence-560 t1_jdd2zzb wrote
AchillesDev t1_jdd0uw2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
>There are very very few "literal woods" inside 495 either.
lmao what
AchillesDev t1_jdd0rll wrote
Reply to comment by DARfuckinROCKS in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
495 gets wicked dark, but 290 is even worse.
AchillesDev t1_jdd0mj7 wrote
Reply to comment by tacknosaddle in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
That's a super small minority that has been shrinking since the 00s. Most headlights aren't aimed high because they're adjusted as part of the yearly inspection.
Sayoria t1_jdd0iik wrote
With the power of friendship, THINGS CAN GET DONE!
We made it boys, gals, and enby pals. We never thought we would, but we did!
We....... we live to see this day. =')
hermitess t1_jdczfhj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
I can only speak to my area, but there are many dark/unlit "literal woods" roads in Hopkinton, Ashland, Holliston, Dover, Sherborn, Medfield, Millis, Norfolk, Wrentham & Plainville. All of those are within 495, so I don't know if I'd say "very very few" places.
pigeononapear t1_jdczd8r wrote
Reply to comment by NoMoLerking in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Yeah, my car’s a 2019 model and I constantly have people flashing at me because they think my brights are on. They’re not. They’re my regular lights, sorry if they’re brighter than normal, but I’m not driving in the dim/dark with no lights because that’s also a problem!
CheruthCutestory t1_jdcz4hw wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Some people might not even be using their high beams. Headlights have gotten brighter.
oogaboogaaa2 t1_jdcyusv wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Why the fuck aren’t headlights regulated? My eyes are burning.
360Waves617 t1_jdcykx4 wrote
Reply to comment by blondiegirl1012 in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Yup most german cars have them nowadays. Even the lower end models...
kajana141 t1_jdcy0dj wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
I disagree. Having the extra light, especially on the narrow, tree lined roads in my town is very helpful.
Tall_olive t1_jddbbu5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
>There are very few literal woods inside 495
Uh, you must never leave the city. Inside 495 has tons of farm land and winding wooded dark unlit roads. Hopkinton, Upton, Millis, Mendon, Sudbury, Holliston, Ashland, Wayland, (South) Natick, to name a few. You sound like you have no idea what you're talking about.