Recent comments in /f/boston
S4drobot t1_jdcprky wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
You definitely need them in parts of waltham and lexington.
Unregistereed t1_jdcploc wrote
Reply to comment by scottieducati in Interesting Globe article about how DCF avoids going through the courts when they take custody of children by dazzlingupstairz
It’s awful. And the people who work at DCF are, on the whole, not bad people (of course there are always exceptions). On the whole, I believe the individuals in the DCF system want to do just the opposite of what they’re doing (protect human rights, maintain safety for children and families). The system is broken and doesn’t have the tools to function the way it should and that’s a real shame with horrifying outcomes. But I don’t think that most people who work at DCF desire to be manipulative and harmful.
[deleted] OP t1_jdcpbes wrote
Reply to comment by HammerfestNORD in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
[deleted]
mattgm1995 t1_jdcp90f wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Lol obviously you’ve never gone through the woods of boxford, Topsfield, Ipswich, etc. High beams are absolutely necessary, just know when to shut them off. Also helpful in identifying the pedestrians dressed head to toe in dark clothing walking on the side of the road at night. Smh
nluken t1_jdcoacc wrote
Reply to comment by HammerfestNORD in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
If you need high beams to drive on Boston’s generally well-lit city streets at night for some reason, I’m scared to think of how you drive outside the city.
Signed, a pedestrian you’re blinding.
Fencius t1_jdcnzfp wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
You certainly don’t need them everywhere, but they’re good to have
tacknosaddle t1_jdcnx2z wrote
Reply to comment by SomeSortofDisaster in Interesting Globe article about how DCF avoids going through the courts when they take custody of children by dazzlingupstairz
There's also a really high turnover rate where a majority of people who get a job as a case worker with DCF burn out within a couple of years. That means the odds of getting someone with significant experience who is better able to assess the situation is pretty low.
That type of inexperience can impact cases like this as well as the ones where a kid ultimately dies despite having an open case with DCF.
EggsFish t1_jdcnsub wrote
Reply to comment by VicVinegar88 in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
>automatic headlights, even my 20 year old car has them.
I had a 2012 that didn’t have them. I think it’s pretty common on the lowest trim package so they can upsell you.
blondiegirl1012 t1_jdcnrny wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
My car has auto high beams. Take that.
FlattenYourCardboard t1_jdcnq3d wrote
Reply to comment by Ordinary_Practice849 in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
then get your headlights fixed.
putinmcockiner t1_jdcnjb4 wrote
Reply to comment by VicVinegar88 in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
There’s a few years there where they started illuminating dashboards at all times but didn’t make headlights automatic yet. Because of this, some people don’t realize their headlights aren’t on because the dashboard is all lit up.
HammerfestNORD t1_jdcn94e wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Fuck off. I use HB pretty much anywhere. I know when to shut them off. HB is very useful to light up pedestrians, bicycles and animals. Even on city streets.
scottieducati t1_jdcmnk7 wrote
Reply to comment by Unregistereed in Interesting Globe article about how DCF avoids going through the courts when they take custody of children by dazzlingupstairz
That may have been the intent of allowing these moves/actions but as usual, they’re abusing the fuck out of it. Fucking pathetic.
johnmcboston t1_jdcmd8h wrote
Reply to comment by Silverline_Surfer in THE ESCALATION IN SOUTH STATION IS WORKING!!!! by K_Gal14
Didn't know it was the same, but I know they keep getting in trouble for the management of FH/QM, and the city councilors keep wanting to cancel the contract, then it falls out of the news.
Upgrayyedd43 t1_jdclweo wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Haha I AM READY!!!!!! Shield wall!!!!⚔️🛡️
[deleted] OP t1_jdcllek wrote
Reply to comment by Upgrayyedd43 in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_jdcl3pw wrote
Reply to comment by symonym7 in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
[deleted]
symonym7 t1_jdckvqs wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
High beams > no beams.
UncleFoxtail t1_jdckq9y wrote
Reply to comment by dazzlingupstairz in Interesting Globe article about how DCF avoids going through the courts when they take custody of children by dazzlingupstairz
This is malicious.
JonnyArbuckle t1_jdcjz0w wrote
NoMoLerking t1_jdcjxpw wrote
Reply to comment by lisa_williams_wgbh in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
It’s just the headlights natural state. My wife’s car came with blinding headlights. I even lowered their angle a little but I still get people flashing their brights at me when I drive her car.
Upgrayyedd43 t1_jdcjdov wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Bruh y’all complain about everything in here
sharpe_af t1_jdciui0 wrote
Reply to comment by f0rtytw0 in THE ESCALATION IN SOUTH STATION IS WORKING!!!! by K_Gal14
Yes. The people movers!
Borner791 t1_jdciob0 wrote
Reply to You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
you used to get pulled over for this, when did that stop?
Ordinary_Practice849 t1_jdcq993 wrote
Reply to comment by FlattenYourCardboard in You don't need to use your high beams when driving anywhere inside 128, and very, very few places inside 495 by [deleted]
Got perfectly good high beams though