Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania

SeptasLate t1_jciyux8 wrote

I haven't been aware of church calling doe the death of anyone recently?

Didn't pope Francis recently go to Canada to apologize and the catholic church in Canada is paying reparations set by the Truth and Reconciliation council? Isn't also possible there are members that are pushing for the church to make further amends? Im not sure why you're choosing to ignore that I've acknowledged and agreed that the institution of the church is corrupt and bad but that not every member us responsible for the genocide. I'm not sure what my great grandma in Ireland did to the Native Americans.

And as for supporting old institutions with sordid pasts I still vote Democrat despite their role in reconstruction era violence.

Amd what was that legislation in PA you were talking about that stops child victims for seeking justice? And what're religious democrats doing? To build off of that do we need to keep religious democrats away from politics too or just the republican ones?

1

princess1arue t1_jcix32f wrote

Thanks for this form number. My sister has a sun allergy and even with UV sleeves and gloves she can burn in a car. She got a strong tint and has a note from her doctor in her glove box but maybe this form would be safer.

1

SeptasLate t1_jciwdpt wrote

I'd rather have to live next to a Catholic than a Klansman but maybe I'm just crazy. I guess a difference is the catholic church also doesn't preach for the enslavement or destruction of my partner or neices. Again the institution is corrupt and has a horrible past but comparing parishioners to klansmen seems offensive to reasons why people are members of either institution, especailly to those who have been targets of the klan.

What's happening in this state where Republicans are stopping child victims from seeking justice. This also seems to be an issue with Republicans. Where do the catholic, Christian, and other religious democrats stand on the issue?

I'm still not seeing anything that would require a new practice of the state protecting kids from "religious abuse."

1

punchyouinthewiener t1_jcivd78 wrote

My sister purchased a brand new Acura from a dealership in AZ with legal tint according to AZ. She then moved to NC and was unable to register her car there due to the tint being illegal for NC, even though it was factory tint.

2

SeptasLate t1_jcitjle wrote

I'm not sure how you can make an honestly compare Catholicism to the Klan. I also dont understand your use of quotes around catholic church. Yes the church is corrupt but that doesnt condemn all of its members.

Im not sure this example works. Parents are capable of beating their kids. They are not capable of sending them to hell.

I really don't see how either of these examples would be religious abuse that would require the state to support a kid, or how either of these are worse than having a kid enter the system.

As an aside, I'm kind of curious now, how to plan on keeping Christains away from elected offices?

1

remembersomeone t1_jcirwum wrote

MV-402 is the form number. It gives you a medical exemption. Your doctor fills out the bottom portion and signs — usually it’s related to eyes so you’d be seeing an optometrist or something similar.

2

remembersomeone t1_jciriff wrote

I don’t understand. There was literally a petition among students (started by the school) going around to grant the school more funding. They even posted an article: https://www.psu.edu/news/administration/story/governor-proposes-71-increase-penn-states-2023-24-general-support-funding/

Looks like it did get a proposed increase. Not quite as much as they asked, but still something.

8

FreeGreenCards_ OP t1_jcirh2f wrote

I see, so basically I risk getting pulled over with any tint because they still have the option to test it and if it’s legal? I’m assuming you’re let go if they don’t find other reasons to keep you, which is what sometimes those stops are meant to do, which is to start other issues

1

FreeGreenCards_ OP t1_jcir9jn wrote

This honestly might sound like a route to go, hopefully it’s not to difficult. Let’s say you were pulled over for it, would you just present the doctors note? Not sure how it works lol

1

FreeGreenCards_ OP t1_jcir0ix wrote

1

remembersomeone t1_jciqzfs wrote

I see you got the answer to your question, and you’ll probably be dealing with a “fix-it” ticket. However, if you can get a doctor’s note as to why you need tint, they can’t make you take it off in the future.

All of my vehicles are tinted. Privacy and heat resistance (if you use a proper film, not the cheap stuff) is pretty nice for summer. However, I’m legally allowed to have tint thanks to less than stellar eyesight. Helps block out the sun and drivers who installed ridiculously bright headlights. It makes driving much easier. The DMV/ DOT is aware, too.

This is just food for thought if you think your situation would warrant tint. If you just want it for personal reasons, be prepared to get annoyed by LE.

3