Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania

Wuz314159 t1_jcamp8g wrote

>“It contained sexual content and descriptions of physical, sexual and
emotional abuse that do not meet the standards of developmental
appropriateness or independent reading material available at the
library,”

PLEASE tell me that they banned the Bible for the same reason.

115

Allemaengel t1_jcajlas wrote

You're preaching the choir there, dude. No argument there.

I've wanted that to happen for his tribe's sake a long time now and for the town to go back to it's original name of Mauch Chunk.

I also think the downtown is overrated, the parking's terrible, we get too many tourists, and the borough's mayor and council are kind of incompetent.

However, the surrounding region's parks are outstanding and it's a nice area to live outside of JT.

I can't think of any town a hundred plus miles from me that I'd spend time hating on though.

1

ItsjustJim621 t1_jcaibw8 wrote

This this this.

As someone studying cybersecurity, I’m wondering what safeguards did LVHN have in place to even protect against something like this?

Security usually starts with endpoints….training to look for phishing emails. From there, we can bolster that with strong passwords, VPNs, creating a zero-trust network etc, honeypots, black holes…. Their IT team needs some serious training and/or network upgrades.

Then again, I get not paying the ransom because who’s to say they’d give the data back? But at that point, they’re really taking a gamble as to making a determination that the information compromised isn’t important compared to financial or business data.

3