Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania

hekishokuneko t1_jb644o4 wrote

It doesn't give any info about if the statements have to be RECENT or not. All my bills are from last year. Maybe someone perusing this subreddit works for penndot or has experienced being turned away because they had a bill that is too old to meet their requirements. Maybe you should grow up and get off of this subreddit. Or reddit in general since it is a FORUM website where people ask questions that they haven't found the answers for or share information that might be helpful.

You assumed I didn't go to their website and thoroughly check the driver's manual to see if bills need to be recent. You assumed I was being lazy. The website tells you what kind of bills. Not if they need to be recent or not. Where in my search I read some states need them to be within 90 days. That's not very "clear" now is it.

Why waste your time on Reddit to tell other people their questions are dumb and to get off reddit. Sounds way less productive than just scrolling away.

10

WCAIS_PA_Individual t1_jb5ba83 wrote

Edit: I'm not a lawyer. I'm not in the legal profession. You obviously had counsel and they did their job. In the final determination - Legal Analysis point one;

"Here, the Request seeks a report of “all titles checked out by those patrons that are not students.”[...]"

The issue isn't they didn't give you what you want, the issue is you didn't ask for the information you wanted.

Your counsel should and could help you rewrite the RTK request, you want policy's that dictate internal review procedure for determination of books purported ability to be removed, and what criteria is determined to make a book become under review. Any communication regarding books that should be or shouldn't be banned directly or indirectly to the board and all their staff.

That's the stuff you want. They can't do anything without having procedure, and procedures need to be followed.

4

mentalgopher t1_jb55bda wrote

The insurance companies usually want you to have an insurable interest in what you're insuring when you bind a policy with them. (Progressive is making you verify an insurable interest in the vehicle in question before allowing the purchase, based on other comments.) You don't actually have an insurable interest in that car until you have possession of it. Therefore, you're going to potentially have an issue with buying a policy. The N.O. policy gets you around that.

The other reason why an N.O. might be to your advantage: What if the deal with Carvana falls through but you find another option in a short period of time later? You'll have a policy that can be changed over no problem without having to shop again.

1

monachopsiss t1_jb4z2nl wrote

Definitely give an agent a call, every one I've ever dealt with been extremely nice and accommodating and will walk you through everything! (Progressive is who I dealt with when I was in your situation. It's not rare at all, they'll tell you exactly what you need to do). They all want your business, so it's in their best interest to be nice and help you out! You don't even need to know a specific agent, just call the general number and you'll get connected with someone who can help. If you end up liking them, get their extension and call them exclusively. Good luck! :)

1