Recent comments in /f/Newark
Nwk_NJ t1_j2xmxp2 wrote
Reply to Went for a lunch time walk around Newark Penn station because it was warm out and I've been staring at this water walkway for years and never got down to it. seems like a great spot yet nobody's ever here It has swinging benches and what looks like eventually will be vendor space by Jimmy_kong253
Wow I love it
Jimmy_kong253 t1_j2xclib wrote
Reply to comment by ahtasva in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
At the end of the day if somebody can't make money they have no incentive. It's the American way my thing if people really want to improve life, you bus all these homeless people and drop them off in the rich neighborhoods and the country clubs. Like George Carlin said there is no Illuminati. There is no mass conspiracy group controlling the world. They all go to the same country clubs the same universities. They know what's good for them they don't need a meeting to make it happen
ahtasva t1_j2xb98r wrote
Reply to comment by Jimmy_kong253 in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
You give the entire system more credit than it is due. Activists; at least the ones that get the most air time are an arm of the establishment. Their purpose in not to create real change but to sell you what the establishment wants you to settle for. Creating mental health resources, affordable housing etc. cost money and acts to move resources from the rich to the poor. The establishment of both parties don’t want that so they contract “activist” to sell you a knock off version of progress. Let the homeless sleep rough and take a shit on every street corner, let drug use and petty crime go unchecked, focus education on identity instead of academics. The cost of these stupid and counter productive ideas are shouldered entirely by the poor but the activist don’t give a fuck coz they get paid upfront; funding , grants, speaking fees etc. there is a whole industry of clowns selling stupid ideas and suckers born everyday who buy into them🤷🏾♂️
cmonsquelch OP t1_j2x22vv wrote
Reply to comment by Some-Mid in Internet Providers? by cmonsquelch
No. Verizon 5G was available, which I tried, but it was downloading at 0.8 MB/s. Their customer service was really terrible
NeoLephty t1_j2wnmnp wrote
Reply to comment by Marv95 in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
How do “tent cities” cause a “deteriorated” cost of living… are you saying that homeless people make it cheaper to live in a city and thus LA is super affordable right now because of how many homeless there are or that people not being able to afford the cost of living and being forced to live in tents causes the cost of living to go up…?
Because neither is true… so I’m confused.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_j2wltef wrote
Reply to comment by ahtasva in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
The problem is the politicians give into the activists demands that penalties be done away with before lining up the rest of what will replace it first. What really needed to happen is You put in place shelters and drug rehabilitation and then you removed the penalties but don't do away with them entirely. What you do is you say here are the services If you as a homeless or a drug addict refuse to take them then we have to deal with you under the old laws. Because at that point you don't want help you just like being a public nuisance
ahtasva t1_j2v08go wrote
The same people who are opposed to development on the off chance that the residents who move in might not be "their people" are advocating for every empty lot, park and open space (both public and private) be turned over to the homeless to become open air drug markets and make shift accommodation. Does in not occur to these clowns that these parks they want filled with drug addicts, mentally ill and homeless are some of the few open spaces that are available to the residents of Newark! The article says as much! Before Prudential fenced up that space, it was open to the public! The proliferation of homeless at the site meant that they had to fence the place in due to liability issues. Now that space is lost to the public; the author nevertheless cannot make the causal connection; instead blaming the (big bad) business! That is what passes for progressivism today . A handful of clowns who live in places where they will never have to see a homeless person much less deal with one have duped a generation of mindless rubes into believing that allowing the unhoused rights that supersede that of ordinary people is somehow altruism!
The contradiction in terms cannot be more stark; yet the ideological zombies just cant see it! They oppose housing on the one hand; then pat themselves on the back with the other for "fighting" for the "rights" of the homeless to shoot up, shit and sleep where ever they take fancy. What grand altruism!! If this policy were anything bordering effective or even humane, one might be forgiven for supporting it, but the evidence is clear; city after city on the West coast that has adopted these policies are dealing with the dire consequences. Some of the best parts of downtown San Francisco now look like a permanent war zone.
Let's face it, the neo liberal ruling class have no interest in solving the problems of the masses; instead they traffic in platitudes and empty gestures; and no gesture is emptier then advocating for the downtrodden to rough it out in our parks and open spaces.
Lets get real; either we give a fuck about the homeless or we don't! If we do; then we must commit to building the mental health infrastructure, public housing and support services needed to ensure everyone is adequately house. If not then STFU and let the rest of us enjoy the few open spaces we have in peace!
surrealchemist t1_j2utglv wrote
Reply to Internet Providers? by cmonsquelch
Fios has been solid for me, and their price gets locked in.
When I used to have optimum cable at my last place the price kept going up every year and fees tacked on so the longer I kept it the more expensive it got and service was not as good but Newark might be better.
TrafficSNAFU t1_j2u7fiz wrote
Reply to comment by Emily_Postal in how is it like for Indians in newark? by Klutzy-Tackle-
Right on Oak Tree Road, a short walk from the Metro Park train station.
Jimmy_kong253 OP t1_j2u5c0c wrote
Reply to comment by MDNTNWK in Does anyone know what happened to the lady who lived on the corner of Peter Francisco Park ? She was there for what felt like years and just disappeared over the weekend. Hopefully they put her in a home by Jimmy_kong253
This is an old picture I posted just so people would know who I was talking about. When I was walking to work this morning it was all gone except for a few items that were cleaned up later in the afternoon
MDNTNWK t1_j2u3wxw wrote
Reply to Does anyone know what happened to the lady who lived on the corner of Peter Francisco Park ? She was there for what felt like years and just disappeared over the weekend. Hopefully they put her in a home by Jimmy_kong253
No way she'd just leave all her stuff if they did relocate her to a shelter. Prayers going out to her.
duk1253 t1_j2twt6o wrote
Reply to looking to buy in James St District by [deleted]
Not that its fun or easy, but you might have better luck trying to ask owners directly.
But as others have mentioned, doesn't seem like anyone wants to sell. Which is understandable given its uniqueness.
duk1253 t1_j2tvu0l wrote
Reply to Internet Providers? by cmonsquelch
I've used Fios and Optimum gigabit when I lived in the North Ward. Optimum hardware gave me issues, but when I swapped it out for my own modem it worked better. Fios modem/router combo works better and is easier for most.
MDNTNWK t1_j2tt7e9 wrote
Reply to comment by Marv95 in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
Honestly, I probably would, its better than being setup on a sidewalk where a car can straight up run over your encampment or under a trainstation.
And I didnt say all of downtown.💀; just a park atleast.
With the ammount of Anti homeless infastructure here, you might as well go to penn station.
Marv95 t1_j2tspr3 wrote
Reply to comment by MDNTNWK in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
Outdoor accommodations? You want this to turn into the literal crapshow known as LA or Portland? Where QOL has completely deteriorated due to the tent cities? You can't have downtown like that when it already suffers from a stigma of being a warzone.
felsonj t1_j2tod7d wrote
Reply to comment by Electronic-Minute-74 in looking to buy in James St District by [deleted]
>newarkermag.com/2022/0...
Crazy that its in such demand, yet there's vast empty lots just a block away.
MDNTNWK t1_j2tnajn wrote
Reply to comment by Jimmy_kong253 in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
Yea, but what pisses me off of is the lack of actual outdoor accommodations for unhoused folks here in Newark. All they really have is Penn Station, and Peter Francisco park which is pretty small. You'd think Millitary park would've been the perfect spot to house encampments but nah.
As far as I've seen, most of the folks are posted on that street between PF park and Penn Station, the ammout of Anti homeless infrastructure in some spots of downtown is beyond me.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_j2tm2k1 wrote
Reply to comment by MDNTNWK in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
That's what the guy told me He retired and lives in Florida now. I asked him before he left because I was walking around Newark and I do remember when it was unfenced. The amount of cost security is and if the city wasn't helping I can totally see Prudential just throwing their hands up and being like you know what fuck it fence it off. That whole downtown area is like Newark's crown jewel
MDNTNWK t1_j2tkymn wrote
Reply to comment by Jimmy_kong253 in Opinion- The Tragedy of Newark's Commons by Newarkguy1836
Damn, have we just really been anti homeless these past 3 years? Ranging from the ordinance charging unhoused folks 500$ for panhandling but mfs wifh actual cars and income $50, the reinforcement and lies regarding food permits for the unhoused, or denying unhoused residents vouchers they got from moving here which was only repealed via june of 2022.
Jimmy_kong253 t1_j2s9urs wrote
As far as the PSE&g spot goes from my understanding from a guy that used to work security there years back there were mornings where it literally turned into a homeless and drug issue. Management was tired of cleaning up needles and a good number of ODs there as well. He told me it was deemed easier to fence it off then have to pay for the extra security and the liability
Newarkguy1836 OP t1_j2s76yq wrote
As of last week, the nature flood basin open space area at the interchange of RT21 & I-280 was suddenly fenced off & there are now Piles of dirt & rocks, concrete debris left by dumptruck.
Newarkguy1836 t1_j2s333a wrote
Reply to comment by ahtasva in looking to buy in James St District by [deleted]
Theres a nice row of similar 3 story rowhomes on Broadway & Second Ave.
Another block on Broad St btw 3rd & 4th ave has a Brooklyn feel to it.
Some-Mid t1_j2rkdq2 wrote
Reply to Internet Providers? by cmonsquelch
No Fios?
uncharteredshit t1_j2r0537 wrote
Reply to comment by ahtasva in looking to buy in James St District by [deleted]
Agree here!
Jimmy_kong253 OP t1_j2xn4ib wrote
Reply to comment by Nwk_NJ in Went for a lunch time walk around Newark Penn station because it was warm out and I've been staring at this water walkway for years and never got down to it. seems like a great spot yet nobody's ever here It has swinging benches and what looks like eventually will be vendor space by Jimmy_kong253
It's just weird. I look at it all the time from the train and there's like nobody ever there