Recent comments in /f/IAmA

8ngryW0lf999 t1_j8ul1rv wrote

Some non-urology (but medical still) questions. And you can combine the responses however you want.

  1. Is becoming a MD in America still a matter of meritocracy? Or do you think it favors students with connections and means?

I've seen many MDs who come from medical families and I feel they have a huge "advantage" over working class students when applying for med school.

  1. Is getting the slots to the best residency / fellowship programs a matter of work performance or connections?

  2. What's your opinion on America's research prowess on urology today?

  3. What do you think of the direction America is headed in terms of medical access and costs of service? Should we remain optimistic?

  4. What's the best way for patients to prepare for their first visit to a specialist? I've visited docs armed with a one - page summary of my medical history and purpose of my visit and many of them barely look at it.

  5. Do you have a favorite Bollywood movie? :)

1

Few-Ganache1416 OP t1_j8uis0r wrote

As of right now, based on the data available, staying away from the spill site is the best option (how much outside of the range is really dependent on the level of concentrations detected near the spill site and wind direction). If you are near the spill site, make sure that the air around your house is monitored frequently (recommended continuous monitoring). If you are well outside of the spill site, there isn't much concern as long as you don't get near any down gradient surface water bodies.

2

Few-Ganache1416 OP t1_j8uhs8u wrote

Definitely would avoid any surface water bodies for a while until they have been cleared if they are connected to any streams near the spill site. As far as drinking water goes, if its from a municipal water supply, your local government will test for those chemicals typically anyways, they should post the results somewhere online. If you have well drinking water, take a sniff of the water and if you smell anything you may want to get it tested (you should have it tested regularly anyways). Just because you smell something doesn't mean it poses a risk to you in the short term. Our olfactory senses can detect concentrations of chemicals well below laboratory detection limits.

3

Few-Ganache1416 OP t1_j8uh9h2 wrote

Environmental remediation typically adheres to risk standards based on adverse health effects observed in toxicological studies. These can range from immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH), to burns, to difficulty breathing, and cancer risk factors. The symptoms people are encountering can be a mix of a few different things. Either they may be particularly sensitive (i.e. outside the standard deviations of the toxilogical study) or they may have had an acute exposure when the accident occurred. Current levels show that current exposure to air and groundwater is not a concern. I would say that surface water and soil near the site should be avoided.

2

KirinoLover t1_j8ug009 wrote

So, I live less than 20 miles away from the center of East Palestine. When they did a 'controlled release' and the winds changed, hazmat guys were seen just down the street, and you could smell it in some parts of the city.

That said, how worried should I be when it comes to my tap/drinking water? What about my dog playing in the local ponds, or in Mill Creek?

2

Meritania t1_j8ufqse wrote

There were two major volcanic eruptions in 536 and 542 AD which led to a period known as the Late Antiquity Little Ice Age. It is suspected poorer diets from poorer harvests led to the Plague of Justinian wrecking havoc with a weakened population.

While there was a decline the Avars, Sassanid and Gupta civilisations, the vacuum led to the rise of Turks, Mongols and Islam. The strategy they have in common is that, at the time, the peoples lived nomadic lifestyles on the fringes of deserts. With the Sun being ‘feeble’, as Roman senator Cassiodrus puts it, these people could be more productive during the day.

3