Recent comments in /f/ColumbiaMD

bigjd7 t1_jarb1ml wrote

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.2402061,-76.8433059,3a,90y,358.71h,93.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snl0UOghX2NS9QtMA9oIKww!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
This is what OP is talking about if anyone is curious. Look at the view from your front window on the 3rd level when these things get built, beautiful view of 108 LOL what an eye soar

2

cjftw17 t1_jaraizw wrote

Not to get way off topic but I wouldn’t trust anything written by that blog. It’s run by Jenny Solpietro, who is basically a parrot for her friend local developer lobbyist Tom Coale.

The irony of running a “progressive” blog while working for Lockheed Martin has somehow been completely lost on her too, lol.

−3

bigjd7 t1_jar9s2b wrote

Yeah the morning commute the traffic leaving the Dorsey area between the two lights is bad. The distance between the two lights and those lights are out of sync to handle more people in that area. The townhouses I imagine would be a continuation of those brick ones behind it. What a god awful view of 108 for 500k lol

2

CookieMonster932 t1_jar6bjv wrote

The villages created by Rouse were high density townhomes or even higher density apartments. The successor to Rouse's company Howard Hughes developers want to build these but people are blocking them from doing so thus leading to lower density housing units and a shortage of housing. Rouse's vision was to create communities with a racial and socioeconomic diversity and Howard County has become more and more segregated on both fronts.

4

mysteryweapon t1_jaq4x1y wrote

> the last thing that area and part of 108 needs is more traffic

I agree, and it's sort of a double-edged sword here

One of the best ways to combat urban sprawl, and traffic, is creating high-density housing, with good pedestrian accessibility, and good public transportation

Public transport in HoCo leaves something to be desired, to say the least

On every other side of the Dorsey Hall Village Center, there was already high-density housing instead of single-family homes with yards, and it has been that way for decades

On the bright side, it's near a center that has a number of essential needs, which increases walkability at least a little bit and could reduce traffic in that regard

> at the expense of our woodlands.

I agree 100%. The value of green spaces is often underrated IMO

It remains to be seen if the developer has any sense of respect for the value green spaces provide to a community

I think it's probably as responsible a spot as any to develop, but without improvements to pedestrian accessibility and better public transport, traffic will inevitably become more challenging to deal with

7