Recent comments in /f/ColumbiaMD

Rashaverik t1_ja1kxg0 wrote

I'm quoting you here.

"I think our community would be improved with more people talking personally with one another instead of online."

I tried that once with Josh Friedman. At the time I was an employee of the Village of LR. It ended with Nina and Josh sending the same attorneys the IAT and CA Board have used, to talk with me.

I had written a long response to your comment above, but thought it was best left offline. I'd be more than happy to talk with you over a cup of coffee.

4

goliebs t1_ja17ifx wrote

Over the last several years, Inner Arbor Trust/Symphony Woods and CA's relationship with that organization/park has repeatedly been a source of contention. Lawsuits, a lack of financial audits, conflicts of interest, seemingly endless grants, relation/cooperation with other downtown non-profits... Its just non-stop drama with IAT. This level of attention is totally out of proportion with the importance of one 36 acre park compared to everything else CA is responsible for - and this speaks poorly of the leadership of CA's board and IAT.

6

Sufficient-Item-2750 OP t1_ja0s2uw wrote

If you want to look at financials, these are not up to the minute, however many 990s are here (they are a publicly available document for any nonprofit, IAT posts to their website, but you can get for any NP via guidestar or similar). https://innerarbortrust.org/financials

Page 11 and page 29-30 for the most recent 990 posted for 2021 will give you a view of that year by expense type.

From listening to the CA board meeting it seems like at least part of the issue is the most recent fiscal year (different from calendar year) 2022 audit has not yet been produced, yet at the same time IAT is being considered for more funding. I believe the 2022 fiscal year would have ended April 2022 (based on the FY listed on the 990s), and from listening to the discussion at that meeting, it sounds like the audit for that year has not been provided to CA. There were a number of comments at the meeting indicating these funds were needed for paying for the audit, amongst other items. It is not clear to me from listening to the CA discussion if the IAT audit provider for the year that is needed has been hired or engaged yet.

6

Rashaverik t1_ja0icao wrote

I'm in complete agreement. I'm not sure what it's going to take, but I eventually expect there will need to be some form of legal action against the CA Board for their actions. At the first mention of HB1024 you can see just who is against it because they fear loosing power that some of them have held for over a decade or longer. We need big changes in CA elections and specifically the CA Board.

13

NoDaikon9612 t1_ja0gl3i wrote

This board president just watches as unethical behavior happens on his watch. Clearly he’s cool with it all. The IAT board members (who also serve on the CA board) who didn’t recuse themselves and voted to give their other board funding is a clear conflict of interest. No debate. Meanwhile no other community grants were awarded or seriously considered. You don’t have to be a lawyer to figure this dumpster fire out. What an embarrassment!

14

ylime32 OP t1_j9zqtf4 wrote

Reply to comment by zweischeisse in Kindness at Dunkin by ylime32

Perhaps the Route 1/Guilford location? It has several lanes, one specifying Mobile order. Shaker drive also, they have more lanes, but no sign indicating to bypass the line.

1