Recent comments in /f/CambridgeMA
BAM521 t1_jajrrxf wrote
Reply to comment by crazicus in Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Oh so that’s what “Christ on a bike” means
crazicus t1_jajrlb3 wrote
Reply to comment by BAM521 in Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Some people would blame the crucification of Christ on bike lanes if they could
unfeatheredbird t1_jajqrpt wrote
100% the Tower at Mount Auburn Cemetery which is on the outskirts of Cambridge but has an amazing view of the whole area. It’s not always open this time of year so you may need to call them and ask or wait until spring. But Mount Auburn itself is incredible in spring, do win-win.
BAM521 t1_jajqi4g wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
All the comments on the Cambridge Day’s Facebook post are people blaming the new bike lanes. I feel like I’m going insane.
ONTaF t1_jajpvul wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Didn’t they just do a renovation of some kind? So sad to see this, they are a neighborhood staple
NodensInvictus t1_jajnhky wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Ohh fuck this noise.
slippy_slidey t1_jajid0i wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Wow I am so bummed. Atwood’s and Toad forever ✊
OKalrightOKAYalright t1_jajhbvm wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
This sucks big time.
Kind-Construction-57 t1_jajf91w wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Once got to see Delvon Lamar Organ Trio there. To this day, it’s still a top three concert memory for me. The atmosphere was top notch. This is a real bummer.
unresolved_m t1_jajeook wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
That sucks.
ndiorio13 t1_jaje0gz wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
It is depressing seeing a lot of these longtime local restaurants/bars close down
Captainbostonfish420 t1_jajdk81 wrote
Amazon is nothing compared to the plastic pollution generated by India and China. Unless you plan on invading those countries to collapse their economies, any suggestions you write into your congressmen is absolutely laughable.
AllProfitNoCost t1_jajcxit wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
Such sad news, loved the vibe of Atwood’s
MatNomis t1_jaj6sd5 wrote
Are you still at school? One of the big ones in Cambridge? Some good spots require a university ID.
Opposite_Match5303 t1_jaj6jr6 wrote
Reply to comment by desicant in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
You just aren't listening. Of course those things are bad. You haven't shown any evidence that they are worse: any comparison of the harms of additional plastic to the harms of additional energy use.
Unless you are asserting that there is no harm from energy use which could possibly be as bad as the harm from plastic, which is prima facie ludicrous.
desicant t1_jaj3is3 wrote
Reply to comment by Opposite_Match5303 in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
???
Yes. I am asserting that making more plastic (which doesn't break down, makes microplastics, and leaches endocrine disruptors into environmen) is bad compared to not making more plastic.
I don't think we have to wait until a final tally of the global chain of production, distribution, and consumption is performed to n-th levels of accuracy to take reasonable steps towards harm reduction.
And, just to be clear, it isn't k cups that matter - but the actions of corporations and their intransigence against removing plastic from their business model.
Opposite_Match5303 t1_jaj0g26 wrote
Reply to comment by desicant in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
You are asserting that the harm from a K-cup's worth of plastic waste exceeds the harms of a cup of coffee's worth of energy. That is not at all self-evident.
desicant t1_jaiz5mx wrote
Reply to comment by Opposite_Match5303 in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
The example you used was k cups versus just grinding the beans.
Just grind the beans and minimize the plastic waste.
We don't actually need complete information to avoid obvious problems.
Opposite_Match5303 t1_jaiyiuq wrote
Reply to comment by desicant in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
Right, I wholeheartedly agree that plastics are bad. But to show that they are worse, you need to compare them to the alternatives. My point is that it's so easy to point to all the harns you enumerate, and say "plastics bad! We should ban disposable plastic coffee cups!" when it's entirely possible that such a policy would cause harm to the environment on net.
desicant t1_jaixp14 wrote
Reply to comment by Opposite_Match5303 in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
It's just worse pollution.
Plastics don't biodegrade but instead fragment - leading to microplastics in the water, soil, and our insides. Plastics can also leach chemicals into the environment that are estrogen mimics or endocrine disruptors. These can cause developmental issues and cancer in humans and other life.
There is no way to ensure plastics are "handled appropriately" in the sense that the only alternative to waste burial is incineration - which costs more energy and requires gas and particulate scrubbers to remove the (now incinerated) pollution.
Opposite_Match5303 t1_jaivu8d wrote
Reply to comment by desicant in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
> the pollution produced (the plastic itself) is worse than the energy component.
Worse on what axis? If the waste is handled appropriately, I don't see how it inherently causes harm independent of the energy and resources used in its creation .
> we shouldn't be focusing on individual choices here.
I'm not: I'm saying that theres reason not to blindly trust individual intuition as to what societal changes will actually help the environment.
desicant t1_jaiu9g9 wrote
Reply to comment by Opposite_Match5303 in Open Response to Congresswoman Clark's recent letter by noob_tube03
This thing with the energy component is that plastic may take less energy to produce but the pollution produced (the plastic itself) is worse than the energy component.
But again - we shouldn't be focusing on individual choices here. Plastic pollution (and energy waste) are driven by commercial and industrial practices not individual ones.
Rhapsodie t1_jaitqh7 wrote
It's not exactly in the town but Robbins Farm Park in Arlington gives a nice unobstructed pano view of the skyline. Atop the excellently named Bussey Hill in the Arboretum also gives a nice view.
It's even farther out but the Blue Hills reservation has some great ridge walks where you can enjoy high and far views of the city, though at this point it's a bit far without binoculars.
[deleted] t1_jajs8jy wrote
Reply to Atwood's Tavern is Closing by zepporamone
[deleted]