Recent comments in /f/BuyItForLife
ldeveraux t1_jarnddc wrote
Reply to comment by Walkop in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
you've never owned an Apple product but you're telling me the M1 and M2 are the tops.
JohnDoeMTB120 t1_jarm4wk wrote
Reply to comment by Walkop in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
I think there's a difference between maintaining something and replacing a part every now and then (resoling a boot for example) vs. replacing literally every part over time so that eventually there are zero parts of the computer that are from the original purchase. Just my 2 cents, but I don't think computers are BIFL. Technology advances too quickly and makes every part in the computer obsolete in 10-15 years.
[deleted] t1_jarlyph wrote
[removed]
Walkop t1_jarlvhx wrote
Reply to comment by ldeveraux in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
I don't own a single Apple product and I never will , at this point. But you can't deny the facts, M1/2 are great designs. They're just ludicrously expensive and will never see the light of day in a product that isn't thousands of dollars. Not the full die, at least.
They also aren't meant to compete with AMD and Intel and the majority of cases. They never will be able to.
Swift-Tactics t1_jarkq5u wrote
Reply to comment by carbon_sink in Thursday Boots - Worth It? by Cimon_40
Tell your friend to hit the sub with a discount code :D
FamiliarWin4833 t1_jarjmy3 wrote
Reply to comment by cannotrememberold in Is there any hard evidence (not anecdotal) that "high quality" clothes actually last longer than their cheap counterparts? by bingworm
I actually was thinking a longer period of time than from the 90’s until now. Not sure when the washer & dryer were invented, but I would guess they go back further than the 90’s. Also I think it depends what kind of clothing you’re referring to, sure coats and sweatshirts hold up pretty well and probably always have, but that isn’t the case with underwear or some of the clothing made of finer fabrics.
US_Dept_Of_Snark t1_jarjefy wrote
I bought a refurbished Dell laptop in January 2011 for less than $500. I still use it daily. It's working fine. It's on for probably ~12 hours a day everyday. I would do it again -- except that it doesn't look like I'll be needing to for a while.
I don't think that Dell has anything wrong with people upgrading their own computer. I swapped out the hard drive for an SSD. I upgraded the RAM.
Frame work sounds pretty expensive, compared.
Glad it's working well for you though.
dcabines t1_jarj9ev wrote
Reply to comment by nasanu in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
>its about not wasting resources
Then using second hand equipment will always be better than buying anything new.
handymanny131003 t1_jargvk5 wrote
Reply to comment by Chakramer in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
While this is true the idea behind this device is that certain pieces, like the keyboard or trackpad, don't go obsolete as fast as the CPU or GPU do. They also encourage you to use your old internals as a mini PC when you upgrade, which eliminates even more e-waste. That, combined with the fact that it's so damn easy to repair, means that while it might not be BIFL, it's certainly not "cry when the screen breaks"
ldeveraux t1_jarglcy wrote
Reply to comment by Walkop in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
OK I didn't realize I was talking to a fanboy, nevermind.
Walkop t1_jargjn0 wrote
Reply to comment by F-21 in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
So far, so good. They've been around for a while now, and the LTT has a pretty massive investment in them.
Walkop t1_jargf4b wrote
Reply to comment by ldeveraux in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
They are that good. The M1/2 are no joke. But they're not magic sauce, they're incredibly expensive to make because they are massive dies on the most expensive node you can get, which gets exponentially more expensive the larger you go.
Walkop t1_jarfvlx wrote
Reply to comment by spambearpig in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
Apple didn't convince anyone of anything. The only reason that the M series chips are good is because they are ludicrously expensive to produce, and a massive die. It's not because they broke some boundary.
The M1 Max is the size of an AMD 5950X, and a 30 series GPU PUT TOGETHER. It's not some Apple magic sauce. It is on the most advanced node you can get manufacturing wise, it is incredibly large, which means it is ludicrously expensive to make. The only reason it works is because it's in an Apple device that is integrated top to bottom. It would never work for an off-the-shelf component. And it would also never work in a cheap device.
Don't get me wrong, it's a very well performing, very efficient chip. But it's that way because it's incredibly expensive to make, more so than any dedicated desktop CPU on the market right now, with the most advanced manufacturing.
To top it all off, there's no reason that a chip like this could not be socketed. It could easily be designed that way. If they wanted to, which they obviously do not.
Walkop t1_jarfl9f wrote
Reply to comment by JohnDoeMTB120 in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
What is buy it for life, then? Only things that never break? Repairability is a big factor, most things that are by it for life require maintenance. Look at boots, any high quality boot in this sub will require regular maintenance, resoling, all sorts of things in order to keep it buy it for life item.
Walkop t1_jarf64n wrote
Reply to comment by zombienudist in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
It's not them, it's you who doesn't understand the conversation.
The conversation isn't talking about performance. It's talking about how the frames and boards aren't designed to be future proof.
For example, Intel could have designed a CPU interface that had a thousand unused pins. Buses that have massive extra unused width. Then these interfaces would last much longer, and it does not really increase cost of manufacture.
There's no need to constantly be replacing and upgrading interfaces. Interfaces themselves aren't complex to manufacture. They're nothing relative to the chips themselves. The only real reason is planned obsolescence. They could easily be designed to last multiple times longer than they do, and they just don't.
It's the same thing with soldered components. Most components don't need to be soldered, and they don't benefit from it, unless you're in a hypermobile device. The only benefit is to the manufacturer.
cannotrememberold t1_jardqrb wrote
Reply to comment by FamiliarWin4833 in Is there any hard evidence (not anecdotal) that "high quality" clothes actually last longer than their cheap counterparts? by bingworm
Your premise that people wash more than they used to. If we are talking 100 years, sure, but the diminished lifespan of most clothing has happened over the last 20-30 years, and ease of washing is likely not the culprit in that.
JohnDoeMTB120 t1_jarcom8 wrote
Reply to comment by Goldie1822 in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
Right. I understand the appeal of only replacing the parts that need to be replaced when they need to be replaced. I just don't really consider it BIFL when ultimately every part will be replaced.
Goldie1822 OP t1_jarb91f wrote
Reply to comment by JohnDoeMTB120 in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
That’s the point, yes, and instead of buying a whole new computer you can replace the obsolete parts. Even down to the chassis.
JohnDoeMTB120 t1_jarahxl wrote
Reply to comment by Goldie1822 in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
Won't literally everything have to be upgraded eventually though? Maybe not the shell and screen, but everything else. Even the motherboard will have to be upgraded eventually.
ldeveraux t1_jar9pe1 wrote
Reply to comment by spambearpig in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
Apple convinced people they want to spend too much money for a name. Sure their products are good, they aren't THAT good.
Regardless, this is designed to be a modular product, so I'd expect it to remain that way as long as Framework is viable. Just like people will keep buying the latest iPhone year after year with little improvement over the last model, people will upgrade their laptops if it's available.
catsandraj t1_jar8mga wrote
Reply to comment by Hfftygdertg2 in Is there any hard evidence (not anecdotal) that "high quality" clothes actually last longer than their cheap counterparts? by bingworm
They also have Worn Wear, where they take back used products and sell them at a discount. The fact that there are so many used items they can sell in good condition is evidence that their products hold up pretty well.
Hulks_Tank t1_jar8lro wrote
Reply to comment by franksnotawomansname in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
I have a Fairphone and really like it! Only negotiable point for me is the image quality of the Camera. There they could do better. The rest is fine
zBarba t1_jar8kq2 wrote
You just opened a world to me, that looks great
Avaisraging439 t1_jar7q1y wrote
Reply to comment by Goldie1822 in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
Ex marketing here, I knew I could spot a fellow marketer from a mile away lol
Candid-Tumbleweedy t1_jarnlk5 wrote
Reply to comment by ReferHvacGuy in LAPTOP?! Yes, laptop. Framework, specifically. by Goldie1822
Yea without a real graphics card this it totally useless to me. I wish I could use it but nope